[–] Blood-is-Nature ago
The text is too long so I had to cut out large parts of your quotes, sorry about that. Also I seem to have not communicated my point in some areas. Sorry for not being clear.
No problem. I appreciate all input.
Do you believe your theory or not? If you do, does it change? If it doesn't, then your theory is contradictory because it doesn't change. If it does, when and how?
Of course I don't believe in the laws of nature; because I don't have to. I base my constant adaptation on them as the foundation of fundamental truth. That ongoing adaptation process is aimed at trying to disprove the laws of nature. I will proceed like this until my death. That is adaptation to constant change, which is the instinctive behavior of all other lifeforms, to which I add the human ability of comprehending the consequences of all actions. Furthermore the instinct are the command line of our operating system (for lack of words); that instinctive command line are the laws of nature that we receive from nature, which is in charge over us, which we can prove by simply convincing our minds to commit suicide by holding our breath, which the survial instinct received from the outside will overrule by forcing us to breath. This also is an excellent exercise to comprehend your place in this ecosystem and just how close to death we are at any given time; as in; how close life and death are connected with each other.
As for how the laws of nature can represent fundamental (unchanging) truth..."opposites must coexist", because they're defined by each other. If you have a ecosystem based on constant change, where every statement would be an assumption; therefore not a truth, but a lie, then the rules that this state of change creates, which are governing it, have to be the opposite. Why? Because change is based on TIME initiating movement, which defines all existence as moving from a beginning towards an end, which for us life-forms represents inception (life) and death. That is what creates the first natural law "opposites must coexist", because they're defined by each other. See change is defined by steadiness. Only something that was steady before can change, and you can only steady something that changes. They are fundamentally defined by each other.
Nature isn't a "thing". What is "nature"? Are you just using "nature" so you don't have to use the word "God"? It seems like that. But then you're just calling God by a different name.
Thank you for pointing this out; it shows that you have higher discernment than most. This is an enclosed ecosystem and nature is the sum of all things within sustaining it. This is a self sustaining system in which all conscious beings and inanimate objects represent a different part of the whole machine. All creation comes from the ALL working together, not the ONE. You cannot form a thought that isn't inspired by what knowledge nature offered you, which is you using the materials offered (mimicking) to reshape it. The act of procreation is not just the male and the female interacting; it's the seed and the eggs, the thoughts in their heads, the contents within their bellies, the land they stand on, the life that maintains it, the air that they breath, the countries, the physics, the laws of nature governing it all and so on. It's the sum of all things that is required to work together to make the act creation possible.
Another example of creation without a creator is a drought, where all remaining life gathered around the last water source. There predator and prey will stand together while operating under a completely new set of temporary behaviors, which means they will not attack each other, because the survial instinct overruled everything. So without a creator, without the ability to form rules, or the ability to comprehended the consequences of rules for all; a new set of behavioral rules were created by the sum of all things coming together under that particular circumstances and all life there instinctively will follow these rules, without communicating them. The entire concept of the ONE is based on hedonists attacking the ALL (our unity) to protect themselves from the consequences of their actions; namely the ONE (hedonists) claiming ownership over the ALL (slavery of their own species, all infrastructure, all natural resources, all life, all fruits of our labor).
Now, what you correctly pointed out is that the term "nature" is a baseless assumption (so is God). This is why I operate in fundamentals, because I already dealt with this problem by pointing out that nature doesn't name anything, so that's the foundation of language for me. All lies. Nonetheless, until people like you fully comprehend this I still have to utilize it to help them out of it. The mantra I use is "simplicity means truth; complexity hides lies", which translates to me to dragging any complexity presented down to the natural foundation, which is why I can effortlessly adapt to whatever you present from within my mind. I seldom use quotes, I don't throw books or scripture at people and I avoid everything that requires a belief to work.
As for the different name for God...First let me explain to you the fundamentals of any story presented. There are three important foundations to any story; an author, his intent, and the target of his intent. Without engaging with one word from the story I already know 50% of what is presented...I'm the target and the intent is either positive or negative. Then I use commons on the author (doesn't matter one bit who he is)...is the presented story coming at me from above me or from below me? Why is that important? Because distributing of information requires infrastructure, requires a power structure (power always corrupts), has the selfish intent to maintain control of the power structure. Making the intent of all presented (vetted) information into a negative intent direct at me. On the other hand if the story comes from below or within my hierarchy; I can immediately deduce if the control structure above is trying to prevent me to have access to it (that's a story worth engaging with) or if it's suspiciously allowed to spread around (making it a tool of subversion from above).
Knowing all this and having figured out that the intent of the presented story contains a negative intent towards me; I can ask myself a crucial question.."what could be used to negatively influence me?" Now we go into the story and we see that all names, dates, locations etc. are nothing but props of storytelling. They can be infinity replaced at convenience. What cannot be replaced are the handful of core story lines that the limits of our ecosystem are allowing (this is also where your math ties into this, because existence is finite, hence there's only a limited amount to anything). Those story lines are for example order out of chaos or from zero to hero etc. All very simple concepts found in any and all stories presented. So anyone with the knowledge of that would never waste their time reading a story beyond the point where he comprehend the foundation of it. All the props are spectacles for the mindless believers; distractions of comprehension for mass population control. It's why 24/7 news (north, east, west, south) is using repetition to indoctrinate reactionary behavior at face value.
You can freely change God with Allah and Jesus wit Mohammad, and nobody would comprehend the difference; unless...you hold preconceived notions in form of beliefs, which would then create a contradiction to your reasoning, which you based not on natural reality, but on your beliefs. This is how mankind is being controlled, and this is also where the talmud comes into play, which made a doctrine out of utilizing contradiction against reason to prevent action (against them and for yourself). Of course the doctrine represents those in control vetting it for the utilization among lower classes, so the "contradiction of reason" - tool, has been used way longer then that.
Another important aspect of every story is the selfish (hedonism) use of analogies, which are all deliberate obfuscations of knowledge originating within nature. It's the usage of secrecy; justified as a teaching tools to make it easier for (lower) people to comprehend it. To see through that lie you need to comprehend that a student is defined by his teacher, which is a substitute authority to nature; which is the only real teacher, authority; source of knowledge. So we have here hedonists, withholding nature through secrecy to get into positions of power, so that they can claim ownership over those below them. They don't want those below them to raise; they want to stay in control and accumulate more power by exploiting everyone else. That is the starting point of how humans used secrecy to numb the comprehension of other humans towards learning from nature. Now add the systematic steering away of humans from nature through religions, and the abrahamic religions; pulling of the exchange of the laws of nature with the laws of men (the rules of hedonists, and you start to see the bigger game of control being played here.
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago
I don't understand why you think you can know anything about something as capricious as nature?
Because I comprehend the foundation of change and that it is defined by fixed rules. The only thing that prevents you to do the same are all the beliefs our parasites have instilled within you. Your mind is constantly running into contradictions which you have to justify against your beliefs. My only struggle is to avoid all your contradictions, while using this corrupt language (pig-Latin) to communicate nature to you. There's no agenda or deception in my statements, because me using simplicity leaves no room for lies, which is why I do it this way. You would notice a lie, because it would try to drag you into something, instead I question the foundation of everything, which let's you run into contradictions in your beliefs.
Again; I'm not intelligent; I simply comprehend the rules of this system and apply it to communicate.
You're trying to "sell unquestionable authority in exchange for blind faith" to "nature", are you not?
Nature demands survial; survival demands adaptation; adaptation demands unrestricted comprehension of reality. Nature wants us to question everything, which is why it presents us all its wonders nonstop, why it segregates differences so that our senses can detect and learn from them. The laws of nature demand to be followed by using adaptation on them, by us questioning them with each of our actions. That's why have the freedom of choice for all our actions, but only nature can judge the consequences. And again, nature describes the sum of all things; the ALL. You and me and everything else, our existence defines the rules. It's a self sustaining ecosystem.
On the other hand we have religion...don't question; follow order; or else. That's the framework in which you are allowed liberties to operate in, and if you start to question certain things; like E. Michael Jones did to abortion, then you get the boot and can look for another doctrine, or just jump like a bitch to another denomination, which is just more division from the perspective of the controllers. Now look at the birds outside and ask yourself "do they seem to be affected by any of it or are they just following the laws of nature while using adaptation to whatever comes?" You live in a system (the laws of nature including religions) within a system (the laws of nature), and you are being controlled and preyed upon by parasites, who corrupted your comprehension of the real system by creating the belief in the false one; the one they control to exploit you.
Which is why I reject your notion of nature, and believe my notion of a loving God.
And that freedom of choice to reject comes from nature, and if you reject "God" and observe any other life form that doesn't believe or the so called "atheists" then you will notice that they all still have the same freedom of choice, which you also still have, so your belief has nothing to do with that at all.
God says "I am who I am". Your concept only makes sense if there is no objective truth. If there is objective truth, then you can proclaim it.
There is no objective truth in a system that changes. "I am what I am until I'm not anymore". That is the difference between using that which nature offers, and claiming ownership over it. If I proclaim my assumptions (based on claiming ownership over truth in motion) to be a truth, I proclaimed a lie into this system, which contradicts it, which now is the conflict between opposites, which creates negative consequences.
"I am who I am" seems to be something fundamentally true.
Until it isn't anymore and you die. the difference is the constant change; TIME, and I don't mean time (lower case) as our measurement of the movement of change, because that is based on endless different perceptions, like how a fly can perceive his entire life in the span of a a day, or how we perceive time differently when we grow older. When I say TIME, I mean the initiator of movement that defines all existence as moving from a beginning towards an end, because despite all our individual perceptions of time; there is TIME affecting all of us combined. This is btw once again another limitation of language struggle I run into all the time. Super annoying.
Objective truth is the reason that the universe can exist and we can understand it. Without it, life, much less the understanding of "nature" as you described it, wouldn't be possible.
Nope, all it is is you trying to hold onto something, because otherwise you wouldn't know what to do. It's you shirking responsibility, which is based on your fear of death. That is how they got you; the weakness they feed upon; the reason you fell for false authority and accepted substitutes for unavoidable death. It's selfishness (hedonism), which is a natural temptation luring you towards death and a bunch of parasites are utilizing it to deceive you.
What you're missing is adaptation, because your beliefs won't let you, and the laws of nature that govern this assumption based system, which they corrupted you into not comprehending. It took me years to question myself if the laws of nature could work without all the religious baggage attached to it. I was sick and tired of running into lies and contradictions everywhere so I was trying to figure out if there is anything that is fundamentally truth, and every time the laws of nature came back into my mind; I thought religion and dumped them right out again. Years wasted on finding answers, and once I let my self question myself I started comprehending for the first time of my life and it's ever growing since. I had to teach myself adaptation for a couple of months, and how to deal with the great lie that is our reality, but that's nothing but a little effort and going through the stages of loss. Now I'm actually an active participant in this ecosystem, instead of a slave to my mind.
Agree, that's why nature isn't perfect. It's a battleground between Good and evil.
No. Perfection and imperfection are not natural states, they're human assumptions, same with good and evil. You can easily see through this, because you can freely define what either of them is. You think a murderer is doing evil, yet at the same time he thinks he's doing good. You are proclaiming a judgment (claiming ownership) based on your assumptions, which creates conflict. Look at predator and prey in nature; no conflict, just adaptation to each other. They coexist with each other without holding on to fear all the time they are not directly in contact with each other. When a lion kills a buffalo, then for the buffaloes it's just another lesson for weak links in their survial. You; the human are the one pointing the finger and proclaim who acted good or evil. That's the selfishness of you wanting to be the one in charge (the ONE) that makes the judgment, then you notice the negative consequences and try to find a vessel of authority to shirk it onto. In comes the parasites rubbing their hands.
[–] zxcvbnasdf ago
Nature demands survial;
Surely not. Surely nature demands nothing, for we can die if we wish. Nature allows exploitation if we wish. I see no such demands.
And again, nature describes the sum of all things; the ALL. You and me and everything else, our existence defines the rules. It's a self sustaining ecosystem.
Yes, I agree. I call Him "God".
There is no objective truth in a system that changes. "I am what I am until I'm not anymore". That is the difference between using that which nature offers, and claiming ownership over it. If I proclaim my assumptions (based on claiming ownership over truth in motion) to be a truth, I proclaimed a lie into this system, which contradicts it, which now is the conflict between opposites, which creates negative consequences.
I feel like you're sneaking in a lot of concepts here. "I am who I am" is true regardless of when I say it, and it's true no matter when I say it.
The statement is not "I was who I am", it's not "I am who I will be", and it's not "I was who I will be", and it's not "I will be who I was", and it's not "I will be who I am".
The statement is: "I am who I am". That is always true. No matter what time you ask it of me.
Nope, all it is is you trying to hold onto something, because otherwise you wouldn't know what to do.
But this is exactly what you do, here:
The unchangeable laws that define the changing system
You are saying I'm trying to hold onto something, but you have something you're holding onto too. So by what merits do you claim that what you're holding onto is true and what I'm holding onto is a delusion?
I can explain each and every individual action, while using the term "nature" to tie it to the sum of all things (the All), while you diminish every individual action by slapping the term "God" on it (the ONE), without having any proof, while demanding unquestionable belief from everyone. I make anyone comprehend everything (at least I try) and no belief is required in any way, shape or form. All the contradiction I run into while using adaptation are towards human beliefs, which is by design to control us; to divide us (compartmentalization, which you promote), to destroy our unity; to make us selfish.
God is the One, not One. He is the One True God (what you call "nature", but even more than that, much "bigger" than your concept), and He is everything. He is "All". I have no contradictions, and I am not dividing us. I don't seek to divide us. I seek common understanding, and unification. That is the opposite of division, so I don't agree with your characterization.
When you say that you can make things that are unnatural, you claim to create out of nothing.
I can, and so can you. That's what this communication is. We created something out of nothing. Just like God did in Genesis when He spoke the world into being, so too are we speaking our world into being. Based on our free choices, it can either be beautiful or ugly. Good or evil. That choice is up to us, because He gave it to us.
you want to achieve something.
What do you think I want to achieve?
I'm not gonna bite. I live martial arts my entire life and know the ins and outs of manipulating my consciousness through mediation (which I do in motion) to create whatever feedback I want.
If you can create whatever feedback you want, how do you know you're adapting to nature and not what you want? How do you prevent yourself from deluding yourself?
As for the different name for God...First let me explain to you the fundamentals of any story presented. There are three important foundations to any story; an author, his intent, and the target of his intent. Without engaging with one word from the story I already know 50% of what is presented...I'm the target and the intent is either positive or negative. Then I use commons on the author (doesn't matter one bit who he is)...is the presented story coming at me from above me or from below me? Why is that important? Because distributing of information requires infrastructure, requires a power structure (power always corrupts), has the selfish intent to maintain control of the power structure. Making the intent of all presented (vetted) information into a negative intent direct at me. On the other hand if the story comes from below or within my hierarchy; I can immediately deduce if the control structure above is trying to prevent me to have access to it (that's a story worth engaging with) or if it's suspiciously allowed to spread around (making it a tool of subversion from above).
Knowing all this and having figured out that the intent of the presented story contains a negative intent towards me; I can ask myself a crucial question.."what could be used to negatively influence me?" Now we go into the story and we see that all names, dates, locations etc. are nothing but props of storytelling. They can be infinity replaced at convenience. What cannot be replaced are the handful of core story lines that the limits of our ecosystem are allowing (this is also where your math ties into this, because existence is finite, hence there's only a limited amount to anything). Those story lines are for example order out of chaos or from zero to hero etc. All very simple concepts found in any and all stories presented. So anyone with the knowledge of that would never waste their time reading a story beyond the point where he comprehend the foundation of it. All the props are spectacles for the mindless believers; distractions of comprehension for mass population control. It's why 24/7 news (north, east, west, south) is using repetition to indoctrinate reactionary behavior at face value.
This way of viewing a story throws out too much information. Reality does not exist at one level, it exists at infinitely many levels. This is the power of the fractal nature of symbols. You can use symbols to stand in for various places in the fractal nature of reality, and in doing so you can gain a deeper appreciation of reality and it's complexities. If you throw this information that is being freely given to you away, then you are missing an infinite part of the understanding of the story.
These ideas are not "complex", they're incredibly simple. They're the most simple thing there is, but they describe something as complex as "nature". Like nested Russian Babushka dolls, each level if a deeper look at the same. A deeper understanding of reality awaits. Not more complex, more simple.
Also by your logic the story you're telling me is trying to negatively influence me from below, are you not? Should I interpret this conversation as an attempt by you to attack me from below with abstract concepts that have no relation to reality, to get me to question myself?
I don't look at it that way, but it seems that's the only choice you've given me based on your worldview.
You can freely change God with Allah and Jesus wit Mohammad, and nobody would comprehend the difference
This is completely wrong. God and Allah are different. Jesus and mohammad are different. That's like saying my mother could be replaced by your mother and I wouldn't comprehend the difference. Of course I would. They're different people. They say different things. They act differently. They promise different things. Clearly I would recognize and comprehend the difference if you tried to switch Jesus for mohammad. It would change the entire story! It changes the meaning entirely.
Perhaps you don't care about the meaning of things, but personally I find understanding that meaning to be a better way at understanding the world so I can adapt to it in a more elegant and positive fashion than by ignoring it.
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago
Like nested Russian Babushka dolls, each level if a deeper look at the same. A deeper understanding of reality awaits. Not more complex, more simple.
No, what is simple is the seed that grew into the tree, that was sustained by the ecosystem surrounding it, that was harvested by an infrastructure of hedonistic ownership, which supplied the processed wood to the proclaimed artist for a price, so that he can use his intent to create the art called "Babushka" that inspired you to use it to make a point.about simplicity That's a small window in how I comprehend reality; a very abridged version. You are missing multiple layers of comprehension as to what simplicity means.
Also by your logic the story you're telling me is trying to negatively influence me from below, are you not? Should I interpret this conversation as an attempt by you to attack me from below with abstract concepts that have no relation to reality, to get me to question myself?
I already stated that I don't believe, so NO you should absolutely NOT believe me. I try to get you to use adaptation instead of belief, because belief only creates division and conflict, hence you calling out my intent based on your beliefs, despite me telling you multiple times that I don't hold any beliefs. Everything I describe of how to engage with any story is a roadmap for you; the believer. I adapt to the 99% being enslaved to 1% logic of starting my process from the negative side; doubt over trust, until the balance favors the other side, which is unlikely to happen during my lifetime, but I will adapt if it does. Also you have no idea if I'm below or above you, you have put trust in that as well, which is another reason for the anonymity of social media; it creates cloaks that draw out the temptation to lie, which one way of subverting the world towards talmudic reasoning, through the acceptance of lies. Now read up on the Smith-Mundt Act to comprehend that lying is already legally allowed, which originates from the legalization of the talmud, which allows religious and legal protection for a doctrine that teaches to lie to everyone that doesn't believe in it.
Anyway...don't just question yourself; question everything and never stop. How is this a negative proposition in any way? It's adaptation to change by seeking knowledge.
This is completely wrong. God and Allah are different. Jesus and mohammad are different. That's like saying my mother could be replaced by your mother and I wouldn't comprehend the difference.
You wouldn't have any idea without the instilled beliefs inside your mind. And as you see in your reaction it causes division and conflict, and I just changed names (another example why nature doesn't name anything). What you don't get in your mother/child example is that those are bound by blood. You are bound by belief, which was instilled within you to destroy your bound of blood.
Clearly I would recognize and comprehend the difference if you tried to switch Jesus for mohammad. It would change the entire story!
Your belief is making you argue the 0 (your belief based fantasy) over the 1 (natural reality). You can only know someone that you met in reality, when your senses react to each other, and even then you will never know him fully. You are being deceived into arguing about if Sonic is better than Mario, and you never met those too. Nothing you hold onto is based on any reality whatsoever, you are being tricked force your perception of reality to your fantasy., and you're being exploited because of it, and I have to face the consequences of that behavior as well. So how about joying us in reality?
Perhaps you don't care about the meaning of things, but personally I find understanding that meaning to be a better way at understanding the world so I can adapt to it in a more elegant and positive fashion than by ignoring it.
A meaning changes in a constantly changing system and your beliefs are holding onto them instead of adapting.
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago
Surely not. Surely nature demands nothing, for we can die if we wish. Nature allows exploitation if we wish. I see no such demands
Nature is in charge; not us. Our first breath is acknowledging natures demand for life over death; that's the prime instinct all life shares. You first need to corrupt yourself severely to break that contract and chose death over life. Religions represent the industrialization of that self destruction as an exploitation racket for hedonists. They exploit the father/son relationship to create blind faith towards false authority, and they exploit the fear of death to instill blind faith through beliefs. It's a devious tool of social engineering; psychological manipulation of masses by using shame, fear, dependency etc. All to give control over the many to the few; the ALL to the ONE.
Yes, I agree. I call Him "God".
And that's the problem, because you selfishly allow yourself to believe that you can ignore the importance of each individual act necessary to sustain the whole. You are being tricked away from comprehending your part in building unity to create protection, and instead they gave you false authority who gathers false unity, which protects against nothing.
I feel like you're sneaking in a lot of concepts here. "I am who I am" is true regardless of when I say it, and it's true no matter when I say it.
When I say "I am who I am" then it proves what you said a lie, because from my perceptive "You are what you are". You and I are now in contradiction to each others perceived truths, which creates conflict. In a hundred years both of us will be wrong, because then "we were what we were" , which would be defined only be the people who still believe that we ever did. This example alone teaches you that language can never be anything but assumptions (lies), but since this entire system is based on change; everything can only ever be an assumptions until it changes. It is the selfish behavior of proclaiming that is the problem, the act of trying to hold onto to time by declaring it a truth, which is obviously once again based on the fear of death, because you don't want to your time to run out, you want to survive, despite your comprehension about death being unavoidable. All other lifeforms are not afraid of death, they value life by maintaining it through adaptation. Their intent is not fear; your is and it was indoctrinated into you.there's nothing to fear, because you comprehend the outcome since the beginning (death). You shirk the responsibility to face reality, and that's why you hold on to beliefs to justify and excuse the consequences.
The statement is: "I am who I am". That is always true. No matter what time you ask it of me.
"No matter what time" is you contradicting your statement, because time is change. You will die and then you won't be anymore. That's the psychosis you get need to get over.
Nope, all it is is you trying to hold onto something, because otherwise you wouldn't know what to do.
But this is exactly what you do, here:
See it this way....every other life-form knows instinctively what do to; except humans. Your beliefs are causing it to stay this way, why I propose to adapt to what they're doing, because they follow the rules of the system which creates them. You follow rules that other humans proclaimed to you as truths, and you use them to justify stagnation against adaptation; against change. You are trying to force your belief over reality. Where in nature do you see behaviors such as this?
You are saying I'm trying to hold onto something, but you have something you're holding onto too. So by what merits do you claim that what you're holding onto is true and what I'm holding onto is a delusion?
Because I don't believe in the laws of nature; I try to disprove them, because a perfect heaven, a paradise full of virgins and life after death are so much more comfortable pipe-dreams than the reality of living among suicidal idiots who have less comprehension of reality then a cockroach. Yet, so far no luck disproving the laws of nature; just endless confrontation of contradiction through human beliefs. Sure I could use self delusion, but comprehension of actual reality has perks that are so much more enticing, that I rather stick to adaptation and the maintenance of reality, over shirking responsibility and damning it all to self destruction. Having children helps comprehending the need for maintenance.
God is the One, not One.
"Opposites must coexist", because they're defined by each other. "There can only be ONE" is from Highlander (he's immortal too), why do you think the concept of the ONE is endlessly shoved in our faces for thousands of years? Control requires authority, and total control requires authority that cannot be unauthorized; that is immune to rebellion, that is immortal; unquestionable, that isn't real...that is the belief in authority.
I seek common understanding, and unification.
Thousands of years of Christianity achieving the exact opposite and you still keep destroying yourself. People come out of churches with more questions than answers, and the more wise believers are running towards the division of denominations, while still backing the umbrella of religion that is bursting from within with crimes against the world at large. No difference to science. Unity in misery is what I see., but it's a false unity of selfish islands that are preying towards death giving them a way out. Meanwhile here's me and the duck using adaptation towards each other to create something positive in reality, while quacking about the so called jews, and I learn more about nature from that than any religion could ever offer me.
I can, and so can you. That's what this communication is. We created something out of nothing.
Which is inspirited by something out of natural reality. You cannot have an original thought. Prove me wrong and make up something that isn't inspired by the sum of all things around you. And remember that it was you that upped the ante on this by adding genesis to it. You are a small constellation of a larger energy, which defines what you can do. The individual action is defined by the collective consequence, and the individual actions create the collective consequence. Balance.
What do you think I want to achieve?
A reward after death. A way out of reality. Authority to acknowledge your shirking of responsibility. You want your beliefs to be real, so that you don't have to face reality and your own responsibility to it.
If you can create whatever feedback you want, how do you know you're adapting to nature and not what you want? How do you prevent yourself from deluding yourself?
It's because I don't train with live weapons, but with substitutes, because every once in a while reality (substitutes) interrupts my fantasy (mediation in movement) in exchange for another bruise, reminding me about the balance between life and death all over again. We throw tennis balls at each other if we catch each other drifting out focus; it's a great exercise.
This way of viewing a story throws out too much information.
No. A story is already a manufacture allegory of knowledge based on nature, and it demands the reader to accept the authority of the writer as a teacher between nature and the reader. If you don't question intent; all presented information becomes a minefield of potential threats to your life. You step blindly into deceptions of unknown proportions. Comprehension of intent means awareness, disarms deceptions, and shrinks all the lies attached for making the deceptions work.
Reality does not exist at one level, it exists at infinitely many levels. This is the power of the fractal nature of symbols. You can use symbols to stand in for various places in the fractal nature of reality, and in doing so you can gain a deeper appreciation of reality and it's complexities. If you throw this information that is being freely given to you away, then you are missing an infinite part of the understanding of the story.
This is now a sales-pitch for blind faith utilizing complexity to confuse the one it's targeted at. For you; the believer; it is a corrupt survial instinct to use contradictions (based on the talmudic reasoning they teach you) to protect your beliefs. They sold this nonsense of realities within realities to obfuscate what constant change means for the perception of finite reality. The constant change of perception, which would demand the need for adaptation, which they don't want you to have, because they want you to believe instead, hence when something doesn't jive, it isn't your fault, but everything else. The exploitation of the selfish shirking of responsibility, until they even blame reality itself.
Reality does not exist at one level, it exists at infinitely many levels. This is the power of the fractal nature of symbols. You can use symbols to stand in for various places in the fractal nature of reality, and in doing so you can gain a deeper appreciation of reality and it's complexities.
That's your statement, and the following is your justification for it..."These ideas are not "complex", they're incredibly simple. They're the most simple thing there is, but they describe something as complex as "nature"". Re-read it a couple of times an then ask any 3rd person for his opinion, while leaving out your part in the creation process, and report back to me what they said.
[–] zxcvbnasdf ago
Look at predator and prey in nature; no conflict, just adaptation to each other. They coexist with each other without holding on to fear all the time they are not directly in contact with each other. When a lion kills a buffalo, then for the buffaloes it's just another lesson for weak links in their survial. You; the human are the one pointing the finger and proclaim who acted good or evil. That's the selfishness of you wanting to be the one in charge (the ONE) that makes the judgment, then you notice the negative consequences and try to find a vessel of authority to shirk it onto. In comes the parasites rubbing their hands.
This is exactly the logic that jews use to justify using goyim as cattle. It's just nature. You and they seem to have a lot in common.
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago
This is exactly the logic that jews use to justify using goyim as cattle. It's just nature. You and they seem to have a lot in common.
We absolutely have; because we both understand more of this system than the majority of the humans. Your problem with understanding this scenario is that they tricked you to believe in one side over the other, which they exploit by constantly contradicting it, while in reality both sides have to coexist, because they're defined by each other. It is neither about one or the other side, but about the balance in between, and aiming your intention toward the good outcome also creates the responsibility to protect yourself against the bad outcome. They are parasites to you (the host). You are cattle, because you act like cattle, which they exploit. Your behavior created them. They are a parasite within your own species. They are a product of your selfishness. They are absolutely everything people say about them, but mankind is collectively at fault for them. 99% enslaved to 1% is not on the 1%; it's a corruption within the 99%. Don't blame a pathological death cult, better yourself.
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago
That's why Christianity teaches that our bodies will be restored.
Again with the substitutes for death, based on your fear of it. Yet it is deeply rooted in our (all lifeforms) nature to grieve loss, thereby subconsciously accepting the end, which you agree to with ever breath you take. And guess what? You will be restored, because you are a configuration of energy, but the next configuration won't be what you perceive as you anymore, which brings me to the core origin of humans falling for selfishness. We identify as our consciousnesses, based on the ability of the inner dialog. We started to claim ownership over that which nature offers for free, and then misused our ability of the inner dialog to make up excuses and justifications (shirking responsibility) for the negative consequences of our actions, which created beliefs we hold onto, which restricted our comprehension of reality (towards the shit we created) to our self imposed restrictions (beliefs). Add TIME to this and you get corruption, a weakness within, and a parasite seizing the opportunity to exploit it. And here we are.
So the consciousness is a sophisticated tool for comprehension of reality and it receives a command line of operation from nature through our instincts (the laws of nature). It furthermore has the ability to to tap into a collective consciousness, as proven by all lifeforms being able to comprehend the "sky-clock" instinctively, like my dogs can comprehend feeding time almost to the second, and I can even communicate with them by thinking about feeding them a half hour earlier and they will come to me and go "Hey, man what's up, where's food?" Try it, this also works with cats, but I haven't had much success with it, because I don't have cats. Also make sure that you do this across long spans of time, otherwise the dog notices that you trick him. I just do it for fun, so don't accept any studied opinion from me on that one.
Long story short (!?) - identifying as the consciousness creates the easy means to shirk any and all responsibilities. Our real identity carrier is the life essence within our blood, which fuels the tool called consciousness, and which is the only way to for us to go beyond death; through procreation (notice how the parasites are all about the control of blood?). Anyway, the maintenance of the bloodline creates the human hierarchy (blood, family unit, race (collective of family units), nation (race holding land), civilization (nation with culture), and the culture comes from the individual traits that the blood is holding. The hierarchy is designed to protect the blood; one layer after another (unity), which is also why each part of it is systematically destroyed by the parasites. So the maintenance of blood creates responsibility, which creates purpose (which no human will give you a define answer to, because they lack identity, which is why they shirk responsibility). the purpose of human life is "creation in accordance to the laws of nature and for the benefit of all", which in return give us all the benefits of the sum of all things, and is the only way to create the best possible breeding ground for our offspring.
Consciousness shirks responsibility; blood gives responsibility.
That's why Christianity teaches that the body of Mary and other saints either doesn't decay, or decays more slowly. Because it is perfect, and thus not subject to the capricious forces you're talking about.
So perfection represents a lesser rotting corpse for you? I leave that uncommitted, but just so that you know, they entire burial ceremony of Christianity was designed to instill fear about death into you, by making a despicable spectacle out of masquerading death as life, and hiding all the reality from the believers, which later also let to the crimes against all other lifeforms whoa re imprisoned, tortured and killed behind anonymous walls, which later turned into the healthcare system of perpetually prolonging suffering (through the exchange of cures for treatments), which consequences are also hidden from the eyes of the masses. All based on the same stories that you so easily believe for selfish reasons.
and find joys you never thought possible.
And that's what they will always be..thoughts.
He gave you life. He sent His son to die for our sins. He sent people to preach His gospel to you. How is that selfish? I don't understand your idea.
Well, you spit into the face of the family unit that created you and the sum of all things that made it happen (the ALL) in exchange for the ONE. Sounds like the definition of selfishness. Next comes the sacrifice of ones own blood for the fruits of ones labor, which translates to the material over that which goes beyond the material. Also selfish. Finally comes the breaking of your selfish vow to the ONE, by putting blind faith into a 2000+ year line of selfish preachers, who operate within an institution that undoubtedly (even as a believer) was severely corrupted in that time-span, into something akin to the manifestation of sin spreading over earth. Each preacher represents a single step of selfish idol-worshiping; directly contradicting the first commandment.
Well, what's great is you can just look to the gospel if you want.
How many different versions of it are there floating around? How is it that Christians couldn't even protect the source of their worship? Have you read the story about what the so called jews did to Oberammergau, a small town surrounded by mountains in Bavaria; Germany that once had a famous theatrical play about the crucifixion until the so called jews systematically corrupted it with anti-semitism claims until the crucifixion itself wasn't even part of the play anymore? Letting usury, sodomy, abortion, human sacrifice and endless child abuse slipping through is one thing, but the source of their faith? Where is the value for mankind in such behavior?
most well attested to writings of the ancient world
Look at your behavior from the outside...you're clinging on to the material of the past, while putting blind faith towards the immaterial in the future (afterlife, heaven), and meanwhile rejecting the participation in the present (a fallen world). And it's all based on belief passed down to you by the very same parasites that usurped the entire world through usury. Where in nature would one observe such a disastrous behavior?
This is in stark contrast to the Koran, which has few copies, all of them disagree in serious ways, and at various times all Korans were burned and rewritten. So if you want to talk about idol worship and oral transmission with the Koran? I'd just agree with you.
Oh I spoke with lots of Muslims and many of the Imams are pretty much illiterate to the writings of the Koran they teach, but the difference is they accept their slavery to Mohammad and see the Koran as a symbol; as an idol. They don't follow the doctrine via words, but via actions. They live in the present and actively so. I pointed out many times the origin story of Mohammad, who orally narrated his views to many "trusted" advisors over the span of 20 years, and then after his death it took another 20 years for those advisors to write it down. This was followed by a time where every wannabe Imam produced his own translations, which ended, as you mentioned with Caliph Uthman destroying them to replace them with his own. That's all official narrative, while the alternative version starts with Uthman getting killed by the so called jews who control Islam ever since. Then again both versions mean nothing to a Muslim, who have their leader, who have their order, and who just bow down to it and move on. Even those that agree with much that I put forward, and who fully understand the social engineering behind all religious doctrines, left me with one statement about their faith...Islam is a until it isn't.
Usury was banned in the early Church
Then change (TIME) happened and now churches have their doors closed, because they accepted fiat currency in form of tax exemptions. Your message here is that the past was better than the present. Have you considered that this is the consequences of the action of selfish ignorance from the believers, who are mere followers of whatever other selfish humans are doing to their doctrine of choice? I could even accept your choice to follow a mass population control doctrine if it was for a positive purpose, but self destruction to the detriment of the ALL is not positive at all.
I don't know how you can say a species that farms others for food and has colonized the earth making it safe for itself isn't the apex predator.
We are being destroyed by ourselves, and every other life-forms has to suffer because of it, but unlike them we can comprehend that it's on us. Also, the ability to comprehend the consequences of all actions makes us mimics; makes us apex of efficiency in everything. At no point do we have to be predators to other life. Again, without selfishness we would be hungry, we kill something and eat it, and that would be it. With selfishness, we started to claim ownership over everything, thereby disrupting everything; thereby corrupting ourselves to the point of having to deal with parasites within our own species that ruthlessly attack our selfishness. This all happened by our own choices, and everything we created is to justify the consequences. We don't build towards something, but are being deceived to build against everything; including ourselves. Only the parasites comprehend what they're doing; despite it being a negative action leading to negative consequences.
[–] zxcvbnasdf ago
Again with the substitutes for death, based on your fear of it.
To be clear, I don't fear death at all. I have had experiences in this life, personal experiences, that make me more scared of life than death, in a lot of ways.
And guess what? You will be restored, because you are a configuration of energy
How do you know that's all I am? Have you seen energy? Is it something science tells you? Something your religion tells you? I mean I agree with your concept, it's just a bit distorted.
We identify as our consciousnesses, based on the ability of the inner dialog. We started to claim ownership over that which nature offers for free
So can I have free access to your body? What controls my access to your body if not you? Does nature? If I'm an apex predator, does that mean nature has dictated I have free access to your body? Why not?
and then misused our ability of the inner dialog to make up excuses and justifications (shirking responsibility) for the negative consequences of our actions, which created beliefs we hold onto, which restricted our comprehension of reality (towards the shit we created) to our self imposed restrictions (beliefs).
What negative consequences is there to me hurting you? Or raping a woman? It's just adaptation right? It's just a belief that raping is wrong, so surely a negative consequence of that belief is that I don't rape? Rape is found all over in nature, so nature does not forbid it right?
Add TIME to this and you get corruption, a weakness within, and a parasite seizing the opportunity to exploit it. And here we are.
I agree with this completely, and it makes perfect sense on Christianity. God sent the Holy Spirit to dwell within us to give us access to morality. God gave us free will to make free choices. That will allows us to choose to be moral or not. Over time, our will is corrupted and we choose to succumb to weakness, and sin against God, which has many negative consequences. The further we get away from God, the further we fall. And time is the cruelest way to be separated from God, for we begin navel gazing and forget who He is. Begin to believe we're gods and that we can do what we want.
So I agree with you, with provisos.
So the consciousness is a sophisticated tool for comprehension of reality
Is it part of nature or not? If it is, what part of nature are you? If it's not, where does it exist?
It furthermore has the ability to to tap into a collective consciousness
I agree. I believe I've done that through prayer. I believe God has shown me things that are so beautiful they have brought me to tears. Not convincing for you, but very impactful for me. Especially when they come as I ask them. Especially when they show me the beauty of perfection.
identifying as the consciousness creates the easy means to shirk any and all responsibilities
If everything is free, then what are "responsibilities"? How do we have "responsibilities"? If associating "oneself" (that doesn't exist?) with one's consciousness is "bad", then who/what is shirking "responsibilities"?
So the maintenance of blood creates responsibility, which creates purpose (which no human will give you a define answer to, because they lack identity, which is why they shirk responsibility). the purpose of human life is "creation in accordance to the laws of nature and for the benefit of all", which in return give us all the benefits of the sum of all things, and is the only way to create the best possible breeding ground for our offspring.
Agree completely. And the only way to do so is through Jesus. Through understanding Him, loving Him, and living for Him. Allowing Him into your heart to give you the strength and understanding you need to make the right choices to accomplish that goal.
So perfection represents a lesser rotting corpse for you?
No, a lesser/non-rotting corpse is a sign of perfection. It's a shine of perfect harmony between the body and the world. A body that never rots is in perfect harmony with God (or you'd say "nature"), by definition, no? If it wasn't in perfect harmony, it would decay, yes?
And that's what they will always be..thoughts.
My joy is much more than a thought. I'm sorry if your joys are only thoughts.
Well, you spit into the face of the family unit that created you and the sum of all things that made it happen (the ALL) in exchange for the ONE.
I don't. God is The One True God, Who is the ALL. There is no difference between the one and the many. The distinction is meaningless in God.
Without God, one can fight with others. When one realizes everyone is God's child, that we are all family, the will to disagree and to fight disappears. It is demonstrated to be the affliction of the world that we are called to reject. For we are called to love not just our neighbors, but our enemies. To pray that they will come to Jesus and His loving arms. To feel the hopes and joys of knowing the Creator of "nature". To have a relationship with Him and communicate with Him at will. That is what Christianity teaches.
Finally comes the breaking of your selfish vow to the ONE, by putting blind faith into a 2000+ year line of selfish preachers,
I don't put blind faith into everything. I have studied the arguments. I've studied the evidence. Not only have I found them to be convincing, I have also had a personal relationship with God. That personal relationship is not something I can share with you. I can only point towards it and ask you to open your heart.
who operate within an institution that undoubtedly (even as a believer) was severely corrupted in that time-span, into something akin to the manifestation of sin spreading over earth. Each preacher represents a single step of selfish idol-worshiping; directly contradicting the first commandment.
Ah yes. The Church. The Church is full of people, not gods. If you put all your trust in the people of an institution, then you will find yourself quickly under tyranny, as we have found. Instead one must put their faith in the institution. Faith that the institution will upholds the rules and dictum of the institution. One must have a relationship with the institution, so that one can be held accountable to the truth by the institution, and hold the institution accountable to the truth. If one fails at this and begins to worship man? Then they will be sorely disappointed at the evil that they will manifest into the world. They will be shocked, but they should know better, for they were warned.
How many different versions of it are there floating around?
One. Thousands of manuscripts. One Gospel. All agree. Copied by numerous people in numerous countries across numerous time frames. All of which agree on the core doctrine. Not possible to fake. Not possible to corrupt by man, for the corruption would be obvious due to the fact that it spread far and wide, under control of no man, but under the control of God. Perfectly preserved for us to learn from and cherish, as it deserves.
How is it that Christians couldn't even protect the source of their worship?
God protected it by having it shared far and wide, so that He could oversee its transmission, and not let any man have power over His word. For he needs no man to help Him, He is God. The Truth. The Light.
Have you read the story about what the so called jews did to Oberammergau, a small town surrounded by mountains in Bavaria; Germany that once had a famous theatrical play about the crucifixion until the so called jews systematically corrupted it with anti-semitism claims until the crucifixion itself wasn't even part of the play anymore? Letting usury, sodomy, abortion, human sacrifice and endless child abuse slipping through is one thing, but the source of their faith? Where is the value for mankind in such behavior?
None. and that's why Christians must stand up against jews. Must stand in the truth and the light and trust God to protect them. When they're more scared of earthly jews than they are interested in defending their Heavenly Father, they are acting out of fear and cowardice, and not out of Truth. And thus they are failing in the commandments of God, and they reap what they sow.
What you're describing is exactly what I would expect if Christianity was true.
you're clinging on to the material of the past, while putting blind faith towards the immaterial in the future
No, I'm clinging onto the Truth revealed in the past. I'm putting faith based on knowledge and experience into the future. Nothing material about what I'm clinging to of the past, and nothing blind about my faith for the future.
Then change (TIME) happened and now churches have their doors closed, because they accepted fiat currency in form of tax exemptions
Agree. We agree the message was corrupted by satan. We agree that men are not living up to their duty. We agree they're not doing as they must, and for their sins they are being destroyed. We agree.
We are being destroyed by ourselves
Agree. We are being destroyed by our own free will. The will that God gave us. The will He gave us that we can use to love Him, or hate Him. If we choose to hate Him? We will be destroyed.
The choice is ours. I pray every day that people see the Truth. That they join together in love of God. That we worship Him as He deserves to be worshiped for His perfection. So that we can come closer to Him because I love Him more than anything. I want more than anything for us to be together. For people to drop their hatred, anger, and egos. To join together.
I pray every day that people use this time of quarantine to see how sick our world is. How much evil is abound. And the people of the world are aroused in their desire to love God with me.
Glory be to the Father and to the Son and to the Holy Spirit. As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago
To be clear, I don't fear death at all. I have had experiences in this life, personal experiences, that make me more scared of life than death, in a lot of ways.
Your belief represents that which might be over that which is. You sacrifice the present existence for what you believe comes after death. You can bury your own intent behind this as much as you want; but agreeing to survial under nature by breathing, while holding onto a contradictory belief, is you subconsciously seeking for a substitute for death, which is the origin of all fears.
How do you know that's all I am? Have you seen energy? Is it something science tells you? Something your religion tells you? I mean I agree with your concept, it's just a bit distorted.
When I say energy I mean the core material all existence is based upon; the one we all share; the one we all are "shaped" out of. Why would you think you can claim to be more than what the core energy allows you to be?
So can I have free access to your body? What controls my access to your body if not you? Does nature? If I'm an apex predator, does that mean nature has dictated I have free access to your body? Why not?
Through the blood yes; it's called breeding; the mixing of blood, but the body is just the vessel for the life essence, which is the only thing that can pass on through the bloodline. What you refer to is mind swap; that's science fiction, but there is the ability to tab into the same mass consciousness together, so telepathy (for lack of words) is logically possible, just likely not in our recent predicament of self deception.
What negative consequences is there to me hurting you? Or raping a woman? It's just adaptation right? It's just a belief that raping is wrong, so surely a negative consequence of that belief is that I don't rape? Rape is found all over in nature, so nature does not forbid it right?
Nothing wrong with raping or killing or any other action. Remember that nature gave us the liberty of freedom of choice, so there is no morality attached to any action we could act out. What decides the consequences, which nature passes judgment upon, is our intent, which is where morality based on the natural order comes to play. If you rape a female to create new life, it will have positive consequences; new life, but if you rape for lust, you corrupt yourself into a criminal rapist. As you observe from that situation your intent only influences YOUR actions, and the female you just raped with good intentions may not share the same intent, hence the bloody marks on your chest. This is why you have common sense to pre-judge the consequences of your actions, which is a necessary moral compass if you share a system among other conscious life, because you cannot control them; only try to predict how they might react. That's where chance likes to pop up and say hello, and it also teaches the necessity of unity ; of working together.
The problem with your emotional line of thinking stems from the corrupt laws of men who gave you an ongoing massive list of contradicting do's and dont's to control you. These rules indoctrinate you towards the behavior of passing judgment upon others, which is by design to create more division. When you pass judgment onto others you will then shirk it do those you put the blind faith of authority towards so that they can pass down "justice" so that you feel better about yourself. This is why the media shoves crimes in your face all the time, so that you become judgmental and dependent on their control grid, and of course fear-porn, because nothing yields more energy to harvest than fear, hence the recent pandemic situation (Event 201 - A Global Pandemic Exercise).
I agree with this completely, and it makes perfect sense on Christianity. God sent the Holy Spirit to dwell within us to give us access to morality. God gave us free will to make free choices. That will allows us to choose to be moral or not. Over time, our will is corrupted and we choose to succumb to weakness, and sin against God, which has many negative consequences. The further we get away from God, the further we fall. And time is the cruelest way to be separated from God, for we begin navel gazing and forget who He is. Begin to believe we're gods and that we can do what we want.
So you use a complex analogy that hides reality by taking our roles in all of this out of the picture. Now apply this concept to hundreds of millions of believers, who are not as capable to comprehend reality as we are, and you could see how this would cause a whole lot of harm and create a whole lot of opportunity for parasites to exploit it. If you utilize language to make nature more complex; you are operating within a negative action the second you proclaim it.
Is it part of nature or not? If it is, what part of nature are you? If it's not, where does it exist?
The human identity carrier is the life essence within the blood. The consciousness is "just" a tool for comprehension of reality. It receives information from the outside (router), it utilizes the memory bank of the brain (ram), it works in unity with the ecosystem that is your body (the PC)...it is the operating system, but electricity is the life essence that runs it all. What's missing is the guy sitting in front of the PC making the input, we don't have that. The inner dialog is the communication within a closed system; it's the sum of all things within our ecosystem (body). Again; the ALL; not the ONE, but we fell for the selfishness of the ONE by believing ourselves.
The consciousness is not it's own existence; it's a material function within our vessel and it will die with it; only the blood will move on (if you did your job as placeholder in between the bloodlines by procreating). The inner dialog; the communication within our system is what corrupted us to believe that we are the consciousness. We are not; we are within the blood; it combines the past, the present and the future. Comprehension is just a temporary gift; proven by the lowering of perception based on time; change.
I agree. I believe I've done that through prayer. I believe God has shown me things that are so beautiful they have brought me to tears. Not convincing for you, but very impactful for me. Especially when they come as I ask them. Especially when they show me the beauty of perfection.
It's self delusion. I did it many times through meditation in motion. It feeds from my beliefs, fears and emotions to deliver wants (temptations) to me. The more beliefs I kicked off, the more it helped me focus on thinking, but it doesn't have the same effect as me learning from adaptation (like what I'm doing right now thanks to your inspiration). So again nature taught me the importance of unity over selfishness; which is why I advice against mediation as THE WAY, the Buddhists would call it. They seek clarity in the ONE (themselves) instead of the ALL (unity), which is against because of holding beliefs that restrict their comprehension. Yes you can power through mediation, prayer and even drugs to "elevate" your mind, but it will never come close to that which you receive from unity, which is nature making sure we work together as the sum of all things.
If everything is free, then what are "responsibilities"? How do we have "responsibilities"?
Again you signed to contract of responsibility with your first breath; you accepted life over death, which created the first natural law "opposites must coexist, because they're defined by each other, as well as the 2nd "all actions have consequences" and the 3rd "morality" with it. At that point it's about you lacking self discernment, because your parents teaching you lies and subverting your instincts, based on thousands of years of attacks against the family unit. If you had self discernment, you would learn quickly that procreation is the only means to overcome death, and that "creation in accordance to the laws of nature and for the benefit of all (unity)" is the only way to create the best possible breeding ground fro your offspring, which translates to maintenance, which in combination with your sophisticated comprehension ability and your apex position would fit perfectly into the position of a steward to this ecosystem. It all comes together if we would just let comprehension let loose and adapt accordingly to change. Take our level of comprehension out of the picture and down to instincts and compare it to all other life and you see how they all follow the same laws of nature, without the mental baggage we made up in our minds, and it would turn out fine for them without us playing destroyer of worlds.
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago
If associating "oneself" (that doesn't exist?) with one's consciousness is "bad", then who/what is shirking "responsibilities"?
It is negative, because you corrupt your own intent from the information you hold within (beliefs), instead of the changing information from the outside (reality). that corrupts your actions to create contradictions to reality, which you comprehend as such, because your beliefs restrict your comprehension, and then you make up excuses and justifications, which you don't even have to do yourself, because the parasites are littering your mind with it 24/7 in form of fear and contradictions. The shirking of responsibility part is based on you not owning up on self discernment. This is a hard pill to swallow, because while the world is corrupted against you by your fellow parasites, you can hardly blame the world at large for yourself not being able to discern what your place in existence is. That's what happens when you don't have strong unity that makes it easier for you to understand what's going on. Other lifeforms don't have this problem, because of their instinctive behavior and them actually listening to their senses. So when the fox comes out of the bush, the young deer doesn't go like "What's that? A fox. What does it do? It kills. What are we gonna do? We run. Ahhhhh", instead it senses danger, it perceives the fleeing movement of it's parents and the urgency behind it and it instinctively hightails the fuck out of there (at least in my version of this tale).
Agree completely. And the only way to do so is through Jesus. Through understanding Him, loving Him, and living for Him. Allowing Him into your heart to give you the strength and understanding you need to make the right choices to accomplish that goal.
Yet every other life-form manages to do that just fine without accepting that belief. I could slap Spongebob on that and claim that he's responsible for it all. What's the difference? The other life-forms would continue nonetheless. Yet from the perspective of someone who wants to control (claiming ownership over) others, this looks suspiciously like using deception to make them believe you, it entails just enough similarity to the laws of nature that one would fall for it. What would change is that you would then not be working for yourself, but for those who control you, who don't like unity to come for them and chop their heads off, which is why they corrupt and attack you from every possible direction. Now how does holding a belief helps anyone to adapt against that eventuality?
No, a lesser/non-rotting corpse is a sign of perfection. It's a shine of perfect harmony between the body and the world. A body that never rots is in perfect harmony with God (or you'd say "nature"), by definition, no? If it wasn't in perfect harmony, it would decay, yes?
What is this? Necrophilia? As a "scientist" you should comprehend the basis of alchemy...dissolving into the base, transmutation, order out of chaos, the circle of life and all that. Decay is in no way, shape or form a negative. It is the pass-over into something new. What you call perfection is what the parasites are up to...trying to stagnate change so that they can exploit the present longer. You are in direct violation with the circle of life when you mess with the pass-over process. Oh wait; the parasites got that covered under burial rites. Emptying out the fluids, harvesting the organs, stuffing the corpse with formaldehyde and trash, mocking life itself by masquerading death as it, then putting a box around it to prevent the decaying process for as long as possible. It's beyond disgusting that this is allowed to happen. The rejection of nature in that act is almost incomprehensible.
My joy is much more than a thought. I'm sorry if your joys are only thoughts.
An emotion is a thought until you act it out; then it becomes an action. If you holding it in; it corrupts into a temptation like lust.
When one realizes everyone is God's child, that we are all family, the will to disagree and to fight disappears.
Another ladle of cognitive dissonance to the infighting within Christianity. How is judeo-Christianity and Christian zionism doing these days? Catholicism is just friends among friends these days...I wouldn't even go so hard at this doctrine if it would actually deliver what it promised, but it's self delusion towards self destruction.
For we are called to love not just our neighbors, but our enemies.
Where is the balance in that? You acknowledge order and chaos but you don't comprehend that balance demands defense too. Between defense and offense; defense is the positive, so why don't you use it? Why don't you defend what you believe in against attacks? Defending doesn't mean going offensive; it just means defending at all costs. How can life reject survial?
To pray that they will come to Jesus and His loving arms.
Still with the conversion bullshit that destroyed so much, because you have no defense against lies. Proclaiming what is truth is not a defense against lies.
I've studied the evidence. Not only have I found them to be convincing
How many millions of the so called jews find the holocaust "evidence" extremely convincing after studying it? Have you seen the pile of shoes? How could anyone deny that (they can't; it's illegal)?. There are people working at NASA that believe we went to the moon. There are people outside your door right now who were fooled to believe that they have to distance themselves from their own species, because of deadly viruses.
Instead one must put their faith in the institution.
INSTITU'TION, noun [Latin institutio.] - Establishment; that which is appointed, prescribed or founded by authority, and intended to be permanent. Thus we speak of the institutions of Moses or Lycurgus. We apply the word institution to laws, rites, and ceremonies, which are enjoined by authority as permanent rules of conduct or of government.
Again; blind faith towards false authority to shirk your own responsibilities. If you take the deity (just happens to be unquestionable) out of equation you see the entire charade of selfish humans enslaving each other, yet you cling to the last thing that stands between you and facing the consequences of your actions, which just happens to be the ONE, which represents the opposite of the ALL (unity), as in; selfishness. Why does that make so much sense? Where does my comprehension play tricks on me?
One must have a relationship with the institution, so that one can be held accountable to the truth by the institution, and hold the institution accountable to the truth.
You never apply any of this to reality. You just hold it as a belief and hide behind it. Your relationship with the institution is mental and physical, but you ignore the physical in its entirety to the detriment of all. It's belief restricting comprehension to prevent action.
If one fails at this and begins to worship man?
You did this by breathing, by accepting life over death, by accepting the liberty of freedom of choice, which you used to then accept the authority of another afterwards, and now try to let the new authority claim ownership over that which came before. That is how they used the birth-certificate to legalize abortions, because the birth certificate negates the validity of the nine months since inception; it's how they created the corporate identity of our names in capital letters on the birth certificate, to negate our real life existence so that they can trick karmic justice for the crimes they commit against us. That is talmudic reasoning using contract law (birth certificate) to manipulate the terms and conditions, which later turned into legalized abortion (human blood sacrifice).
One. Thousands of manuscripts. One Gospel. All agree. Copied by numerous people in numerous countries across numerous time frames. All of which agree on the core doctrine. Not possible to fake. Not possible to corrupt by man, for the corruption would be obvious due to the fact that it spread far and wide, under control of no man, but under the control of God. Perfectly preserved for us to learn from and cherish, as it deserves.
So everything is perfect then? Christianity is the bees knees and reality just bites...while you find out the hard way how that will turn out; I stick to adaptation to ever changing circumstances like the squirrels in my yard. The parasites don't even have to try anymore; it's self perpetuation extinction.
defending their Heavenly Father
Against what? Certainly not against blasphemy, because that ship sunk a long time ago. If you could, would you be so nice to throw some scripture at me that deals with this whole self defense is bad dilemma? I need to get to the bottom of this. I need the line that managed to override human survial instinct. Why is the deity in any need of defense and why are believers encouraged to do so but not allowed to defend themselves?
That's why Christians must stand up against jews
No. Never against, but for yourself, which includes defense against. Between order and chaos you cannot go for chaos to create order, because you would step towards chaos and thereby create more of it. You entire intent is corrupted through the division that belief causes. Don't chase the pedophile; defend the child and you're free to do as you please to whomever tries to lay hands on her. That's the difference in how intent changes the outcome.
I'm putting faith based on knowledge and experience into the future
Knowledge and experience towards life after death in heaven...I caste doubt.
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago
Nothing material about what I'm clinging to of the past
The "institution" was past to you through the material men: No direct line to the source, just a game of Chinese Whispers with a corruption rate of 99ish % or let's called it the manufacturing industry of the immaterial, which coincidentally is also the modus operandi of the parasites.
We agree the message was corrupted by satan.
If you create an immaterial analogy (an idol) out of something unmistakably going on in the material you obfuscate reality. That doesn't help anyone. So at the bank counter, when the slave signs his terms and conditions contract and reaches for the credit card; you jump out and scream "Satan did it". How does that help anyone? So NO; I don't agree at all with making secrets out of nature to deceive others.
We are being destroyed by our own free will.
No. By not owing up to the responsibilities attached to it. The terms and conditions of existence; made freely available through the instincts. You gotta listen tho.
The will He gave us that we can use to love Him, or hate Him. If we choose to hate Him? We will be destroyed.
I told you before; love and hate are not natural states. They are umbrella terms that hide a multitude of different natural processes as well endless dangerous contradictions and lies. Rhetorical traps aka weaponized language.
For people to drop their hatred, anger, and egos.
Impossible, because it's defined by the opposites. The positives and the negatives are tied together; they must coexist. You cannot separate them; you can only balance in between them.
pray every day that people use this time of quarantine to see how sick our world is.
You have the parasites to thank for this, because they are using their usurped power to write an enlightenment; revealing arc into history. From the Matrix to snowden, wikileaks, the fappening, the truther movement, google ngram viewer, Websters 1828 online dictionary, Q-anon, up to this pandemic lie...they want us to know.
world without end
Nope. Not as long as TIME defines all existence to be finite; to be moving from a beginning towards an end.
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago
What does "nature show us" and how?
The sum of all things (nature) shows us everything we perceive through our senses and instincts by sustaining this whole system. It segregates differences so that we can detect and learn from them. Understand that you're trying to play a game of rhetoric here, when you substitute Nature and God with each other. They slapped the ONE (the creator) onto everything, despite us being able to prove that all individual existence is tied to the ALL. As a believer you can only point your finger at something and proclaim that God did it, which is the psychological tool of utilizing blind faith in false authority to shirk your own responsibility. They don't want us to comprehend that we have responsibilities within this ecosystem, and they deceive us towards the hedonistic ONE, which represents our own selfishness, to attack the all, which is the unity that protects us, that is the prerequisite for all creation.
How do you know you're not fully determined to believe that and have no choice at all? How do you know you have "liberty of freedom" (can you define this concretely)?
We all accept the contract of responsibility to this ecosystem the first time we take a breath, which is us agreeing to the struggle for life over death. This is the first natural law (opposites must coexist, because they're defined by each other) defining the next one: "all actions have consequences", because in between two barriers (a beginning; life and an end; death) every action made will have a consequences towards one of those sides. Now, since life is always running out and death unavoidable (always luring with deadly temptations) we require that very contract I mentioned for the 3rd fundamental natural law, which is "morality". Nature forcing us to agree with life over death designates value to life over death, which means we now have a positive and a negative outcome to the consequences of all our actions, which creates the demand to uphold the balance in between (the natural order). These are the fundamental laws of nature for all existence. A stone has a beginning and an end, and all our actions can have a positive or negative consequence for the stone, which means that these laws effect all existence; conscious life or immovable objects, since we all share a core form of energy.
Now here you can argue that nature forces the value of life over dead, because our instincts (received from nature) overrule our consciousness, which would negate freedom of choice, BUT the breathing aspect is tied to birth; not inception. At inception there's a struggle between the seeds and the egg, and where there's struggle, there's choice. Now I cannot pinpoint the choice a seed makes (yet?), but I can apply the concept taking from our freedom of choice in life to see that there are no contradictions when you apply it to inception. What I do know and can prove endlessly through adaptation are the laws of nature, which for this case states that freedom of choice is defined as a liberty offered by bondage. They are correct when they say; freedom is slavery, because those are defined by each other.
You just seem to be using the word "nature" for God
I can explain each and every individual action, while using the term "nature" to tie it to the sum of all things (the All), while you diminish every individual action by slapping the term "God" on it (the ONE), without having any proof, while demanding unquestionable belief from everyone. I make anyone comprehend everything (at least I try) and no belief is required in any way, shape or form. All the contradiction I run into while using adaptation are towards human beliefs, which is by design to control us; to divide us (compartmentalization, which you promote), to destroy our unity; to make us selfish.
I can think of many things that are not of "nature" that "exist" (like numbers, abstract shapes, ideas, concepts, information, etc.)
It's you lack of comprehension fooling you here. You already talked about the math behind nature so there is the origin of your numbers, the abstract shapes require your mind to shape them out of regular shapes, your ideas are the based on the inspirations the outside is invoking within you, the concepts are you playing with possibilities and eventualities out of that which nature shows you, and all information originates from nature. Saying the a UFO is unnatural is your lack of comprehension, because a flying object requires you to comprehend flying first, the abstract shape of it requires you to comprehend the regular shapes first, same for speed, lighting, vibration, motion, frequency etc. You cannot create without the sum of all thing making it possible for you. When you say that you can make things that are unnatural, you claim to create out of nothing. See were this is going? It's the human lie of 0, when it's just the lesser of 1. I urge you to study transhumanism, which aims to replace the 1 (the natural reality) with the 0 (the digital fantasy), which has been going on forever and all technology was systematically rolled out to implement total control of the human comprehension. Again; I don't believe this and neither should you, but use adaptation to try to disprove it for yourself (which I couldn't so far), because it's active all around and continuously growing stronger.
Is that a true statement or a false one? How can it be true if it's talking about holding a belief? Surely it's ever changing? What is a lie? What is an untruth? You have a lot of concepts that I agree with almost entirely, I just think they're slightly confused.
You require two things to operate within a system based on constant change. 1. The unchangeable laws that define the changing system (the laws of nature) and a tool that allows you to utilize constant adaptation (our consciousness). With those in place you can adapt to ever changing circumstances (change) by building your assumptions (lies) on a foundation of truth (the laws of nature). That is the struggle to uphold balance in movement; It's about maintenance of the present; not about chasing any goals, because the only goal is death (the end), which we agree to when we breath to struggle for life. It's not about truth or false; it's about the balance in between. The reason you want one side over the other is because of selfishness, is because you want to claim ownership of something; you want to achieve something. What you don't realize is that life is the ultimate price of existence that was gifted to us, which defines the value of everything. Without existence nothing holds any value, and you were even gifted the ability to gift it along to your offspring. What more can you possible WANT, before you realize what you actually NEED?
No. That's a contract between a father and his children.
No. That isn't about religion, it's about selling you the false authority (deity) as the prerequisite for the religious doctrine. They used the relationship from a child to his father to get the believer to shirk his own responsibility towards an authority figure, which they then declared unquestionable in the doctrine which followed, after that they could slap the authority on anything, because you already accepted it from the get go. The reason that worked is because they changed one crucial aspect of the relationship in their deception; TIME; change. The authority of the father ends once the childhood end; hence the teacher being defined by nature as always being temporary, and the responsibility for oneself being defined by the end of childhood. They deceived you to accept a teacher that is eternal, unquestionable and that takes all responsibility from you. Hence the believer becoming selfish to the point of rejecting any responsibility to the present reality, in exchange for the belief in a substitute for death (afterlife, heaven, paradise, spirituality, enlightenment etc.)
You talk about the betterment of the child, but you don't realize that you're the child and that you deceive yourself to not let go of a false father, based on a deception coming from a party you don't even notice. You are being preyed upon through psychological manipulation to not comprehend reality fully (thanks to the beliefs they dump on us).
If a father tells his child to not play in the street, is that evil? Is it "selling unquestionable authority in exchange for blind faith"? Clearly not. So your premise is just invalid.
First; good and evil are also not natural states. Let's ignore those. In the case of the father the authority is not unquestionable, but defined by circumstances like the connection of the bloodline and the paternal instinct. As a father you may have noticed that one characteristic of being a child is to rebel against the authority of the parents, hence the authority figure and the teaching aspect from childhood to adulthood. And as I stated above; he eventually will have to face the reality of the dangers a street holds. A beginning is defined by something ending, so authority over childhood ending is fundamental.
But God is personal. He will speak to you if you speak with Him. He will have a relationship if you want one. That is not "unquestionable" at all. In fact numerous times in the Bible we see characters bargaining with God. God is merciful and just, not a tyrant, and certainly not random like your "nature" concept.
I'm not gonna bite. I live martial arts my entire life and know the ins and outs of manipulating my consciousness through mediation (which I do in motion) to create whatever feedback I want. Stop being selfish and get out of your own head to face reality. Thank you very much.
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago
The consciousness is designed to comprehend all that nature has to offer, but that is based on how much effort the human using it puts into the maintenance of himself and his surroundings.My consciousness can handle everything; but I can't ever live up to it in my short lifetime, and the heightening of comprehension requires the unity of the ALL. That's what the Buddhists get wrong, because they try to achieve it by themselves. This ecosystem is designed to reward unity; not selfishness. So my statement wasn't a boast or such; just me pointing out the foundation of it.
Remember when you wrote that you don't think that nature segregates differences? And here is your own contradiction to it. Of course we are different; every last one of us, even within the same bloodline. So is every blade of grass, and every piece of stone. And all these differences are defined by us all being the same core energy; the natural opposite. We are individual parts of the sum of all things. The human hierarchy, as I stated earlier, stems from the protection of the blood.
Sex is a weaponized term. It means the distinction between male and female, and was corrupted into meaning "fucking", but that physical act has two natural opposites within; procreation (the creation of life) and lust (temptation leading towards death). The nefarious agenda here is to hide the deadly dangers of lust behind the term sex, which was then corrupted further with the term "homosexuality", which is the umbrella term for procreation (creation of life), lust (temptation luring towards death) and sodomy (defilement of procreation). So they not only hid lust but placed a contradiction to procreation into it. that is the kind of deception we are dealing with here on an all encompassing scale and I would very much like to have more people with unrestricted comprehension on my side to take this bullshit apart.
Then the "need to be managed" is based on on us mimicking the leadership principle from nature, but fucking it up through selfishness. There are two ways of leadership in nature...1) the necessity of the collective to have a leader (like the Bee Queen) 2) the temporary agreement of the collective to accept a leader for convenience of better survial chances (the Alpha Wolf). We don't need a leader, and the alpha principle comes with the responsibility of the collective to constantly keep tabs on the alpha, like the wolves do when they challenge him all the time to make sure he is up to the task. Now, there are alpha personality traits within humans, but their status is defined by those who follow him. In a stress situation you have lots of people who have no idea what to do, and then someone emerges that proclaims to be the leader, which the others will accept selfishly to shirk their own responsibilities. That is NOT the alpha, that's mankind building up the parasite that will exploit them. The real alpha in that situation is the guy busy fixing shit, while others naturally gravitate to him, which he easily adapts to by directing them toward unity. Those people were never in charge over mankind, because a) the parasites despise their selflessness and b) they don't like be worshiped as alphas; they just are. It corrupts them with vanity to be constantly reminded about the status quo of what they are.
We learn, yet again...we have the liberty to use it (alpha traits), but not the right to claim it. Selfishness kicking out butts once again.
You just agreed to it for humans.
I don't get your point here. You tell me that you don't believe that nature segregates differences and then you list differences that nature segregated? I just leave a check mark at contradiction and move on I guess.
Why is that not one of your commandments? Minus the disgusting umbrella term "animal". Just say life forms.
Nope; chance is the balance in between just and unjust that is required to make unbiased judgments.How could you trust a coin flip without chance?
No. Complexity can only be created out of simplicity. The origin of a complex problem is a simple question, and once you worked your way through the complexity you're back at a simple question and a simple answer, which leaves behind the path of knowledge in between that is complex, but of no importance anymore to the simple question and answer. It instead becomes another problem to make it simpler. That's when you use abstractions.
No. They define how change operates; as in in-between two fundamental barriers (a beginning and an end). If you have change you have these barriers, and while change changes the barriers stay the same. We as the sum of all things define the laws of nature by our existence; not by our actions; that's why we cannot change them. It's water inside a closed bottle that cannot deplete itself, because the bottle makes the rules that cannot be changed from within.
Free is based on freedom, which is defined as coming from out of bondage, so it's actually a liberty; something that is been given by bondage. So freedom of choice is a liberty given by the bondage to the laws of nature. What you perceive as freedom is under the condition of what this ecosystem allows you to do. That's bondage. That is not a contradiction; it's "opposites must coexist, because they're defined by each other. A natural law.
What you're afraid of is actually losing more liberties given by your slave masters, which you ignore the status of despite most of mankind being enslaved under their usury.
Great conversation so far. Thank you for your time.
[–] zxcvbnasdf ago
I believe that God segregates differences, not nature :) So not a contradiction, just the difference in terminology.
10000000% agree. Absolutely true.
Agree 10000000%
I agree with you completely. The Church agrees with you completely. The Church is against homosexuality as doctrine. It has been infiltrated by the same people who push the nonsense on our towns. On our cities. On our countries. On all of us. I agree wholeheartedly we must reclaim this entire idea for the Good. To reaffirm that procreation is an incredible positive thing that humans should be striving for. To condemn lust as destructive and evil, as a passion that will wilt and leave one barren and desolate.
We agree completely on this.
Agree. There are people who deserve authority and use it for good, and those who don't deserve authority who use it for evil. That idea is understood fully when one realizes that everyone in the group, from the lowest to the highest, is beholden to God. Is beholden to His standard. Is beholden to love Him as He deserves. When everyone is oriented towards God, everyone is on the same path. When everyone is on the same path, there is no problem.
Think of it like a road. If everyone on the road is driving in different directions, then there is chaos. People must move slowly and carefully, or risk hurting themselves or others. If one does not have a powerful enough vehicle, then they have no way to get themselves where they want to go, potentially even stuck in place! But when everyone is moving in the same direction, people can go incredibly quickly. Highways exist where people can travel hundreds of miles an hour together. All because they're oriented towards the same goal. All because they have the same mission.
We should seek to build that highway for humanity, and get us off the chaotic road we have. The only way I see is through Jesus.
Nature isn't segregating the differences, human consciousness is. Human consciousness which I believe is a gift from God. A gift that you can use in many remarkable ways. Truly beautiful.
Humans are very young. We are still learning. We started with very basic 10 commandments, and even then humans couldn't follow them! And I don't mean after a time, I mean almost instantly, as God was giving humans the laws, literally speaking to them, humans did not care. Not at all.
However in spite of this, God did give commands on how animals should be treated. He did tell us to treat them with respect, and showed us how. But he did it as you show a child to treat animals. As we have grown, we have grown in our understanding of how we should exist with relation to nature as a whole. How we should not only treat animals with respect, but also plants and micro organisms and everything that entails. That's why I'm so interested in regenerative agriculture. That's why I'm so interested in buying a homestead with acreage and living in harmony with the land that God gave us. To try to make the earth a little bit better in the area I have under my control. So that I can be a force bringing about God's will on earth.
There's nothing shameful about being an animal. Humans are animals too. I don't see the negative stigma on the term that you do, because I love animals as God commanded me. I don't treat animals perfectly, human or not, but I'm trying. I hope through the grace of God that I can overcome sin and live as He wills.
I don't think judgements should be biased. I think judgements should be biased towards the just.
I don't think we'd have to if the earth was perfect. I don't think the concept will make sense in Heaven.
Simple and complex is a matter of perspective. It's a matter of what you know. I agree we can only really understand complex things in relation to simple things, as a general rule.
Who holds them static?
I want nothing to do with them, as I made clear before. I'm making a more general point. You say opposites must exist. If opposites must exist, then I want the ability to be free. In order to have the ability to be free, there must be the ability to be a slave. I want both abilities. I want the ability to be a slave to those who would teach me that which I need to know, so I can be more free. There is no contradiction here, in my mind.
Likewise.
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago
There is a crucial difference, because one requires that prerequisite contract of belief, while the other is a term describing the physical and mental reality, based on adaption. So when I say nature did this; I grab a handful of it and show it to you in the physical sou that you can comprehend it in the mental. I don't have to say nature; it's not necessary; just complimentary when talking about the sum of all things. Nobody has to believe that there is a whole to the individual aspects in front of them. God on the other hand demands the contract of belief, demands to be proclaimed upon everything, and demands to take center position of authority over everything; yet not such demands can ever be mentally perceived or physically proven by those who don't agree to the contract of belief, which are the vast majority of life-forms within this ecosystem. For all of them, those that believe, contradict logic, reason and common sense. Nobody feels that way about saying nature. That being said; I also only use the term nature because language is restricting me in communicating. If I teach children how to make soil, train martial arts, collect eggs etc. then nature is implied; subconsciously perceived as binding us to this system. There is no such thing that isn't nature within this ecosystem, so a child automatically perceives what is without branding it. A brand (an idol) automatically creates the opposite, so then the child has to comprehend that when I proclaim something to be nature, that something else might not be nature. I just implemented a contradiction into the comprehension of reality of the child.
Start with reclaiming the date of the inception of your life over birth. These are nine months of existence that are being stolen from us. This also has something to do with different frequencies at different dates for different life-forms. So the nine month shift pushed our frequency balance out of order. This is one of the many topics I would like to look more deeply into...If I ever find the time that is.
Again falling for division by using one side (positive) to go against the other (negative). Procreation and lust are defined by each other. The act of procreation will always invoke the temptation of lust, because you lose control over your emotions while doing it. Your condemnation won't cut it. This is like always about our responsibility of balance in between. Every time you engage physically with each other outside the intent of procreation (of creating new life) you are operating under the intent of selfish lust, and that will happen no matter what. It doesn't help to be judgemental about the act; neither before (fear and shame propaganda) nor after (excuse and justification). What needs to be taught is responsibility to control intent during our actions, which is adaption and which is restricted by...holding beliefs. You believe to do positive by condemning negative, but the act of believing is what prevents you from actually adapting. So during the physical act your mind will restrict itself to the comprehension according to the belief, while your body participates in the act subconsciously. Mind and body are not working in unity; they are contradicting each other, because you don't comprehend reality; you don't adapt to it.
Wrong. Deserve means "to serve" and in combination with authority you create an idol out of it. You do this mentally while create a belief that contradicts the physical reality. The alpha doesn't need authority; he just is and you adapt to it. Just like with nature as a whole; you are at liberty to use it, but have no right to claim (proclaim) it, because that would be selfish and creates division and conflict. Don't brand the alpha...adapt to him; follow him; test him; and drop him once he isn't useful anymore. No belief required; no idols (brands) required and no cults of worship required. Also, while you adapt to the alpha, every actions any of you undertake are still about balancing between positive and negative consequences. Following a temporary authority (without proclaiming it) does not give you the right to shirk responsibility for your own actions whatsoever. You will always be the ONE authority over your own actions.
There is no other path than towards death; the end. Change is a one way street from a beginning towards an end.
Everyone is on the same path and all the problems come from the consequences of our individual actions, which will always be positive and negative. The path is movement; our lives are the struggle of balance.
This is completely wrong. You're promoting herd mentality by destroying differences; that's the agenda behind communism. Your highway analogy is literally the party-line. The entire traffic grid situation is not about efficiency; it's about psychological cattle farming and it's based on the nomads building clusters to destroy the rooted. Stop and go is about psychologically attacking the human comprehension of adaptation in the change of nature, by making us loath it. The stress is designed to be harvested as energy and it creates the dependency in the hope for it all to "just flow". They train mankind with traffic to accept the party line; to accept the authority of the system of control; to believe that efficiency is out of their hands. To believe in the ONE, which represents their own selfish shirking of responsibilities. That is also the reason why the masons control all major world wide sports competitions. They herd humans into clusters to harvest their emotional energy, while their perceived unity of "fandom" is nothing but the selfish shirking of responsibility by letting others compete (adaptation) for them, and of course they use idols to sell all this, just like they do with religions.
Nature is the sum of all things within this ecosystem; human consciousness is the ability for the individual part to perceive the whole. The whole creates the individual; the individual reacts to the whole. Segregation is the whole presenting information to the individual so that their senses can learn from it. This is how the whole sustains itself by supplying incentives to the individual participants to motivate them to help sustain the whole.
What you're describing is adaptation to ever changing circumstances; it's the ongoing struggle to maintain the natural order. Once you have your farmstead you will notice how the nature of everything is teaching you responsibility through demand and supply. It is all encompassing and will define your life as a guardian of order that is constantly struggling to direct the flow of nature (the change) into the most productive way, while also teaching you the balance through the spoilage of the overproduce. Life and death, circle of life, chaos and order, TIME, responsibility etc. You will comprehend all of this from the maintenance of your own land; which also teaches you the self sustenance of a self sustaining ecosystem and how your actions create consequences in it. None of this requires you to believe anything. Your rituals of praying, of restricting your comprehension through meditation, your idol worshiping of mental authority etc. All of these represents a selfish waste of time within your farmstead. All the life around you will continue to demand and supply, while you take a selfish trip down mental lane to feel better about yourself. Why? What are you missing in the reality? Are you not surrounded by purpose, responsibilities, benefits, endless possibilities, inspirations, hardships, loss, temptations...everything? Why not just let your comprehension keep spinning in adaptation. Why do you fall for the want (a temptation) of holding a belief, when it's isn't a need whatsoever?
[–] Blood-is-Nature ago (edited ago)
Because it's compartmentalization of individual existence to the point where the umbrella term (animals; humans) is being used as a justification to negate the individual existence, which acts as an excuse for nothing but negative consequences. When you say animal you already diminish all the different life-forms, when yous say cattle you diminish all the differences in that type of species, and when you say cow you ignore that each and every individual member is is own different existence. Now add ungulates, bovine, commodities, prime beef, price tags etc. to see how humans take something simple from nature, then compartmentalize is to an absurdly complex extant, to then slap an umbrella term on it to hide all the shit they did, while also burying the reality of nature deep under a Chinese Whispers game of worshiping the false authority of brands (idols) based on the beliefs they're holding. And then you're wondering while a criminal opportunist puts on a white lab-coat and proclaims "this is a bovine; I'm a scientist; accept my authority and buy my books". Meanwhile; hopefully undisturbed from all this human insanity, a bunch of so called cows are enjoining their day, while eating grass and adapting to whatever happens next in accordance with the laws of nature.
And that's why you are so easily controlled by contradictions, because you cannot comprehend that "opposites must coexist, because they're defined by each other". You are being deceived to follow an us vs them division doctrine, that only allows you to accept one side over the other. You don't comprehend that the other side defines your side. You are fooled to sit in a stadium while cheering for your blue team over the red team, without realizing that both teams are owned by the same parasites. The conflict between them is in your head; sold to you by the parasites. There is no team red vs team blue and there is no order vs chaos. Both are one team; they are the ALL; the sum of all things creating the positive and negative circumstances that you have the responsibility to deal with. What the parasites are doing is making a false idol for you to shirk that responsibility to, which is the beliefs you're holding in your head; the belief of conflict; of division of unity (the ALL) in favor of the ONE (your belief), which is your selfish shirking of responsibility.
It makes sense in reality, because this system isn't perfect. You're holding to an assumption over provable reality. You act in contradiction to reality. You are a victim of talmudic reasoning; you're using it without comprehending that you do. Question it for yourself; try to disprove it in reality.
You cannot know anything in a system that is changing other than the rules that define it. Perspective is assumption of change, which by definition will change, so it is by definition not a truth.
Change does, because change is defined as the movement between a beginning an end. If you start a race you already defined that it will have an end. The length (time) doesn't matter. It will end, because you created a beginning. Opposites MUST coexist, because they're defined by each other. this is a fundamental truth. It cannot be changed. What can be changed is our comprehension of it, hence the deception of "duality" creating opportunities for rhetorical weapons like "love" and "hate". See, I can say that I love vanilla ice-cream and you can say that you hate vanilla ice-cream and yet they're not defined by each other at all, but we both can now believe that we are saying the truth, which will create conflict, which is what the parasites are leeching upon. That's how we are controlled. We are being deceived to believe,controlled through contradiction of belief, and harvested for the energy of the conflict that is causing.
NO, COEXIST. As in unity.
You already have. You have total freedom of choice, but it is defined as a liberty gifted through your slavery to the laws of nature. You're a slave that has the liberty to experience total freedom of choice. You believe freedom to mean that you are in control over everything, but as you see in the so called jews; their control over us makes them enslaved to us. Their entire existence is defined by keeping us under control. I that the freedom you want?
I mentioned that before. This is purely based on yourself restricting your comprehension with belief. In this case you believe in the authority of the teacher; thereby enslaving yourself to that idol of authority. Without that belief in authority you just learn from one another and that's that. You now struggle to understand that, because the parasites have created layers upon layers of deceptions around authorities like all the licensing, the status symbols, the worshiping rituals, the chain of command system, the party line corruption and so on. You don't comprehend that only you have authority over yourself. It was the usage of deities that robbed that from you by making you give your own authority to the ONE (which actually is your own selfishness of shirking responsibility), which is why you know give authority to everyone and everything, because you don't comprehend your own authority anymore; it's restricted within your consciousness by the belief in the unquestionable authority. There is also your contradiction...you believe in the authority to the ONE, while in reality you give authority to the ALL.