0
9

[–] doublejj 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Shit like this is why anons get a bad rap. That's why I tell people to ignore the shills and just absorb the messages from Q.

2
0

[–] trenace 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago  (edited ago)

Interesting that people can actually imagine that when secure communications exist as a readily available option -- including sending an envoy to convey major demands, requirements, or agreements in person but many other ways as well, including secure encryption rathe than this stuff -- people like Trump instead communicate withothers via batshit-crazy open-to-any-interpretation bullshit like this.

Which if it were true is NOT secure since you brainiacs so readily "decode" it.

0
0

[–] Justice-Formidious ago 

Yet you watch lamestream media?

1
-1

[–] ZombiClown 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Why would it need to be secure? Actually there is a huge benefit for it to be open source and open to interpretation, which gives it some plausible deniability , I'm not sold on all of these decode type things myself ,there is a subjectivity to it that can go wonky.The fact that you popped in to decry it is humorous though!

1
0

[–] trenace 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Fair enough because I find it quite funny that anyone actually falls for this. So, mutual laughter at the foolishness or alleged foolishness of the other.

0
5

[–] TJSCPA1 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Just stupid

1
2

[–] ThepowerofQ 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

395 Finally, I figured this one out

RothschildFoundationCronavirusPandemicOct2019

1
0

[–] dudelol 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

🤤🤤🤤

0
3

[–] usmcProud1183 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Obama hasn't flipped I'm surprised that Ricky posted this

0
0

[–] ScotAnon17 ago 

Lost me at Obama has flipped.

Sorry buddy.

0
1

[–] KarlKastner 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I skimmed this thread. If it indeed has merit, it sure isn't written very well.

I vote FAIL.

0
1

[–] Sheneyney 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Yeah I don't get it either

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)