It is attacking a shill. The question exposes the shill. If the shill uses a book to justify a rant and contradicts the same book they are referencing, they are exposed. Normies are retarded. Attacking a shill is exactly what shills want. They want normies to think that anyone who disagrees is called a shill. I engaged and point out the wholes in their logic.
[–] Ducktalesooo000ooo ago
Just attack the shill faggot.
You’re not going to educate anybody about a 2000 year old book using a paid shill as a foil
[–] danjo_kandui ago
It is attacking a shill. The question exposes the shill. If the shill uses a book to justify a rant and contradicts the same book they are referencing, they are exposed. Normies are retarded. Attacking a shill is exactly what shills want. They want normies to think that anyone who disagrees is called a shill. I engaged and point out the wholes in their logic.