0
0

[–] praying71 ago 

If all comments are negative - how come it's rated 50? Farm or fake accounts voting for it?

0
0

[–] praying71 ago 

WARNING: My antivirus warns me about the virus on this website.

0
0

[–] Ghost-Warrior-7 ago 

Verbal jabberwocky jambalaya.

0
0

[–] RecceRat ago 

Who wrote this, was it Yoda on crack??

0
0

[–] POdPatriot ago 

This publication needs to change its name from "newyorkdwi"(driving while intoxicated) to newyorkwwi" (writing while intoxicated.)

0
0

[–] BT1100 ago 

A similar story floated around already 6-9 months ago... No reliable sources, again.

0
0

[–] Publius1778 ago 

This is total junk.

16 judge panel of what? Why?

Grammar is unintelligible.

Junk, Trash, BS

Who needs any of this anyway.

When you have actual evidence in black and white that supports all this, what do you need a silly panel of imaginary judges for?

0
0

[–] Podingo7 ago 

I believe there is some truth to the article, but in no way would POTUS allow for a questionable sentence of 10 yrs..However, if Barr went RICO on most of co-conspirators(20+ yrs w/o cooperation), it would push ( with testimonies of conspirators) to military tribunals...I'd be ok with 5-10 yr sentences for the lower level ppl , saying they were acting at will of Obummer and Hildabeast, to see the rest tried for treason and put out of World's misery.

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)