1
0

[–] DickTick 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Your link doesn't prove a damn thing... Where is your proof of this happening? A blog post by 1 person on a bullshit website certainly doesn't count....

0
0

[–] CanIPlay2 ago 

Did an AI program write this? Serious question.

0
0

[–] corrbrick ago 

Panel of 16 Judges Agrees: Barr Has Sufficient to Indict Clinton and Obama

Sufficient what? Balls?

0
1

[–] Chantebo52 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Enough BS-we need solid proof! SOLID PROOF!! No more-this will bring them down BS!! MAGA!!

0
0

[–] Podingo7 ago 

I believe there is some truth to the article, but in no way would POTUS allow for a questionable sentence of 10 yrs..However, if Barr went RICO on most of co-conspirators(20+ yrs w/o cooperation), it would push ( with testimonies of conspirators) to military tribunals...I'd be ok with 5-10 yr sentences for the lower level ppl , saying they were acting at will of Obummer and Hildabeast, to see the rest tried for treason and put out of World's misery.

1
-1

[–] ManOnFire 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

So fucking what, my 74 year old wife who is an awesome nurse has been denied any stimulus payment from Trump... go fuck your self and get ready for the retribution....

0
0

[–] Publius1778 ago 

This is total junk.

16 judge panel of what? Why?

Grammar is unintelligible.

Junk, Trash, BS

Who needs any of this anyway.

When you have actual evidence in black and white that supports all this, what do you need a silly panel of imaginary judges for?

0
0

[–] BT1100 ago 

A similar story floated around already 6-9 months ago... No reliable sources, again.

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)