0
0

[–] Publius1778 ago 

This is total junk.

16 judge panel of what? Why?

Grammar is unintelligible.

Junk, Trash, BS

Who needs any of this anyway.

When you have actual evidence in black and white that supports all this, what do you need a silly panel of imaginary judges for?

0
0

[–] Podingo7 ago 

I believe there is some truth to the article, but in no way would POTUS allow for a questionable sentence of 10 yrs..However, if Barr went RICO on most of co-conspirators(20+ yrs w/o cooperation), it would push ( with testimonies of conspirators) to military tribunals...I'd be ok with 5-10 yr sentences for the lower level ppl , saying they were acting at will of Obummer and Hildabeast, to see the rest tried for treason and put out of World's misery.

0
0

[–] corrbrick ago 

Panel of 16 Judges Agrees: Barr Has Sufficient to Indict Clinton and Obama

Sufficient what? Balls?

0
0

[–] CanIPlay2 ago 

Did an AI program write this? Serious question.

1
0

[–] DickTick 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Your link doesn't prove a damn thing... Where is your proof of this happening? A blog post by 1 person on a bullshit website certainly doesn't count....

0
0

[–] scoripowarrior ago 

What the hell did I just waste my time reading?

0
0

[–] 4TheRepublic ago  (edited ago)

There might come a day when we read an actual article -- in fluent English -- that reports something like this actually happening. Today is not that day.

That being said, this 'translation' does have its humorous parts.

EDIT: It's a bit scary that this thing has gotten the upvoats.

0
1

[–] Chantebo52 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Enough BS-we need solid proof! SOLID PROOF!! No more-this will bring them down BS!! MAGA!!

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)