1
-1

[–] 23328764? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Maybe. But Q "proofs" are an oxymoron like social "justice" and political "correctness".

The qualifier added before the main word not only undermines it, it negates it. There is ZERO reason for a qualifier unless it's to hide the truth/manipulate. It would simply be called proof. The fact that it takes convoluted webs of red string on a posterboard of scattered ideas to "prove" something, or mental gymnastics always AFTER the fact says all we need to know. Add to that "disinformation is necessary" to cover mistakes and "future proves past" like any good sheister fortune teller...

0
0

[–] 23332876? ago 

Pretty much what i figured. You're a useless shill.

1
-1

[–] 23518398? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

0
0

[–] 23328767? ago 

I'm pretty sure there was more evidence of this somewhere are well. It's known now that he is jewsad anyway.