[–]23046643?0 points
2 points
2 points
(+2|-0)
ago
Nasty comments with derision are frequently shills meant to put you on the defensive so you stop posting.
The question is if the virus was engineered or not. I think that can be answered one way or the other once the hysteria dies down.
Killing off people over 70 in the long term helps an economy because most people that old are no longer working. I think it is a weapon of fear rather than a true bio-weapon. It could be that the initial strains were more deadly, but they tend to mutate to become less deadly over time. Because mutations that don't kill their host have more time to spread, and therefore reproduce more.
[–] 23045977? 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago (edited ago)
less are dying than normal flu.
Yes, the timing is no coincidence, Q already said this.
Weaponized viruses are spread by terrorists, in vials, not spread by eating bats from a chink meat market beside a virus lab. yawn
Weak AF post.
[–] 23046012? [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Read the title. It's my interpretation of Q's post.
[–] 23046643? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Nasty comments with derision are frequently shills meant to put you on the defensive so you stop posting.
The question is if the virus was engineered or not. I think that can be answered one way or the other once the hysteria dies down.
Killing off people over 70 in the long term helps an economy because most people that old are no longer working. I think it is a weapon of fear rather than a true bio-weapon. It could be that the initial strains were more deadly, but they tend to mutate to become less deadly over time. Because mutations that don't kill their host have more time to spread, and therefore reproduce more.