4
16

[–] golgotham 4 points 16 points (+20|-4) ago 

She thinks no one should individually own ANYTHING, and like a good socialist, of course she exempts herself and her friends.

0
4

[–] Poot_McGarvey 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I sort of agree with her on this one thing.

If legislators want to own their own productive capital they can have a blind trust, anything else brings with it various inherent conflicts of interest.

0
0

[–] golgotham ago 

Problem is, my friend, she will not abide by her own reasoning. She is a demoncrat, and a scumbag socialist, so though you have a fine point, do be careful about agreeing with it or it will feel encouraged...

0
0

[–] Asgardener ago 

Once again she shows off her complete ignorance.

2
42

[–] tokui 2 points 42 points (+44|-2) ago 

Useless. They'll have spouses do the dirty deed for them.

Need death as the deterrent.

0
1

[–] flapjack_charlie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Make it so their spouses or anyone living in their household cant either. That's what brokerages do.

0
2

[–] polygeek 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Not as useless as you might think. The questionnaires from the SEC include spousal behavior disclosures.

I like your death option, though.

0
1

[–] 1HepCat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Term limits?

0
7

[–] Gas_the_Jews88 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Guillotines should make a comeback. Death to any politician that breaks the law or abuses power

6
-6
1 reply

0
0

[–] goat-ditarod ago 

Good luck with that. I believe that would cut off quite a revenue stream.