[–] lightmeup77 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Thank you Crensch. And thank you Wyatt, Austere Deplorable
@Western2A for a very complete piece of work.
We wait and pray and work how we can for justice. Please Lord let it come soon.
MAGA
WWG1WGA
[–] anotherukanon 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Can a President be charged with a crime? Only once out of office. Robert Mueller himself told me this simple fact
I wonder who this guy is. It would appear that he is 'on the inside' somewhere.
[–] sheepdoggie 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
He did a great job laying that out. I believe in the end, the Judge whom authorizes the act is responsible for verifying and endorsing the approval. This is where it gets sketchy. The judge may have to answer if and when assuming they are alive. I also suspect this is a reason we see ABJ and the 9th circuit judges being allowed to run rampant with outrageous decisions stretching their power and impacting POTUS and cases like Flynns and Stones. Its for optics and emphasis. Its going to be a hell of a storm.
[–] SCRoadTrip 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Kill FISA today. Now. It's a "trust me" system designed for abuse of American citizens based on politics. It was weaponized from the beginning. It is a direct violation of our constitutional rights. Rand Paul is 100% correct on this and lays it all out clearly how legitimate cases should be handled. Anybody that supports the current FISA is corrupt and wants to circumvent constitutional law. That includes B2, Turtle, Wittle Windsey, etc. You cannot correct something that is fundamentally flawed in its foundation. Tear it down and rebuild the system the correct way as Rand Paul states.
[–] derram 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
https://tweetsave.com/western2a/status/1237217932784082945 :
Wyatt, Austere Deplorable on Twitter: "Obama tried 3 times to get permission to spy on Trump, but was denied by the courts. Barry was even denied by the FISA courts - which is a extreme rarity. Only when Obama lied to the courts and hid the fact that he'd be spying on Trump himself did the FISA agree to this sedition."
[–] GumbyTM 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Rare is an understatement:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/us-spy-court-didnt-reject-a-single-secret-government-demand-for-data/
To be fair the other presidents would have then had a rate of 1.28 rejections per term where Obama had a rate of 1.5 rejections per term.
The big problem here is not so much the rejections but that the orders were sought against a political rival.
[–] PGLiterati2 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I remember when i first learned that the fisa court had turned down these requests--I was shocked. FISA court has been termed a rubber stamp court by so many historians that I figured they didn't turn anything down, That's how rare. You only need the slimmest appearance of evidence--which means they didn't even have that.