[–] 22769390? 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
If the evidence is to used as leverage/Whitemail material or to be brought into play later, they had to let the house flip.
No they wouldn’t. That makes zero logical sense. I don’t know how to make it any more simple. If fraud occurred, the evidence wouldn’t be dependent on “letting them flip the house”. The same evidence would exists regardless of the outcome. You aren’t thinking logically. At all.
e simply can't know the plan. But i'm certain there will be no voter fraud in November. To much is at stake
Again what’s your basis to believe that? You haven’t presented any logical process to any of your comments. Faith? If it’s blind faith just say it. At least you’re being honest. But it’s not logic you’re using.
[–] 22769464? ago (edited ago)
Example: When i witness you stealing in a mall, i can 'report' you on the spot. So you have to give your 'prey' back to the Store and face the consequences.
If i decide to use it to 'blackmail' you (LATER), i'd just videotape you in the act.
In this scenario, you will walk Home with your 'prey' and without facing consequences. Just until i knock on your door and show you my little videotape.
See what i mean? It's not unlogical.
Your other question, about November: 2016 is evidence that there are measures to effectively stop election rigging, as there were attempts. Otherwise, Hillary would be in the WH right now
You are not making any sense. Sorry. The “blackmail” can be replaced with evidence and as I’ve clearly proven, the evidence (blackmail) exists without having to “let them win”.
Not trying to be rude but it’s frustrating to see anons not using any logic. Think about your replies more before you engage someone. You might just end up looking silly if you don’t. Just being honest.
Got to go. Hope this helped.
[–] 22769403? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago (edited ago)
Let me put it this way. If someone is cheating at a casino, the casino doesn’t have to “let them win” to prove they were cheating. The cheating alone is the evidence that proves the crime.
[–] 22769512? ago
Sure, but then you have to "make it Public" - and maybe you Chose that it's Not the right time for that.
[–] 22769535? ago
Nonsense. Again, the evidence exists without needing to let them “get away with it”.