1
-1

[–] 22769357? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

?

If the evidence is to used as leverage/Whitemail material or to be brought into play later, they had to let the house flip.

The Dims used it for their peachmints, what was there goal from day1.

We simply can't know the plan. But i'm certain there will be no voter fraud in November. To much is at stake.

2
-2

[–] 22769390? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

If the evidence is to used as leverage/Whitemail material or to be brought into play later, they had to let the house flip.

No they wouldn’t. That makes zero logical sense. I don’t know how to make it any more simple. If fraud occurred, the evidence wouldn’t be dependent on “letting them flip the house”. The same evidence would exists regardless of the outcome. You aren’t thinking logically. At all.

e simply can't know the plan. But i'm certain there will be no voter fraud in November. To much is at stake

Again what’s your basis to believe that? You haven’t presented any logical process to any of your comments. Faith? If it’s blind faith just say it. At least you’re being honest. But it’s not logic you’re using.

0
0

[–] 22769464? ago  (edited ago)

Example: When i witness you stealing in a mall, i can 'report' you on the spot. So you have to give your 'prey' back to the Store and face the consequences.

If i decide to use it to 'blackmail' you (LATER), i'd just videotape you in the act.

In this scenario, you will walk Home with your 'prey' and without facing consequences. Just until i knock on your door and show you my little videotape.

See what i mean? It's not unlogical.

Your other question, about November: 2016 is evidence that there are measures to effectively stop election rigging, as there were attempts. Otherwise, Hillary would be in the WH right now

0
1

[–] 22769479? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

House was maybe considered kinda harmless. Evidence gathered will maybe used as leverage or brought into Play in a later Stage.

I agree. That's exactly what I've thought all along, since Q stated "The Senate was the key".

1
-1

[–] 22769403? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Let me put it this way. If someone is cheating at a casino, the casino doesn’t have to “let them win” to prove they were cheating. The cheating alone is the evidence that proves the crime.

0
0

[–] 22769512? ago 

Sure, but then you have to "make it Public" - and maybe you Chose that it's Not the right time for that.