2
-1

[–] 22769295? 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

You’re not following. Why would they have to let the house flip to get evidence? The same evidence exists regardless the outcome.

1
-1

[–] 22769357? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

?

If the evidence is to used as leverage/Whitemail material or to be brought into play later, they had to let the house flip.

The Dims used it for their peachmints, what was there goal from day1.

We simply can't know the plan. But i'm certain there will be no voter fraud in November. To much is at stake.

1
-1

[–] 22769403? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Let me put it this way. If someone is cheating at a casino, the casino doesn’t have to “let them win” to prove they were cheating. The cheating alone is the evidence that proves the crime.

2
-2

[–] 22769390? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

If the evidence is to used as leverage/Whitemail material or to be brought into play later, they had to let the house flip.

No they wouldn’t. That makes zero logical sense. I don’t know how to make it any more simple. If fraud occurred, the evidence wouldn’t be dependent on “letting them flip the house”. The same evidence would exists regardless of the outcome. You aren’t thinking logically. At all.

e simply can't know the plan. But i'm certain there will be no voter fraud in November. To much is at stake

Again what’s your basis to believe that? You haven’t presented any logical process to any of your comments. Faith? If it’s blind faith just say it. At least you’re being honest. But it’s not logic you’re using.