[–] tastelessinvective 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago (edited ago)
I'd never heard of this case. The wiki article is so annoying. It just goes on and on about how the police were abusive and the juries were too white. Blah, blah, blah, blah, blaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah.
I want to know if they actually did it or not. The victim says they did:
That coupled with the fact the establishment narrative on wiki totally side steps the issue leads me to believe they did it.
The other side seems to be ass mad that there was some vigilante justice involved. Why should I give a fuck about that? They totally ignore the law whenever they feel like it and this is ancient history. Booo hoooooo waaa waaa waaa the poor little rapists got punched by the police :''-(
[–] biochemist345 1 point 8 points 9 points (+9|-1) ago
They should have been hung 70 years ago. Dumb fucken welfare niggers need to be firing squaded.
[–] thebearfromstartrack 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
I wonder who is PAYING for this herculean nigger parasitic effort, as well as who is actually DOING all the WORK?
[–] GeneralDisposition 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
And you thought they were just like us. They vote for trump now so they are no longer racist. They choose black every fucking time.
[–] lord_nougat 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
execute them
[–] Herkules97 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago (edited ago)
Am I correct in my guess that the fact is mentioned because a nigger "can't do no wrong"?
Reading on, perhaps it's because white rapists weren't jailed? Or simply that black men were treated bad, but not whites?
So if "injustice" against a race happens, it's ok to rape?
Why would you want to give a rapist that clearly has done it, freedom again?