[–] Monkeyshinerbot3000 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Jewish modern propaganda. In other words.... Lies, lies, lies.
[–] ketoll 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago (edited ago)
There they go again twisting it.
It's SIMPLE!!!!
And yet they always twist these two points in the 2A as though the militia is an exclusive government-ordained group and that the right to not infringe is conditional that there is a government-ordained militia. Nowhere is this written. This kind of psychological mental gymnastics is insane.
Also I need to point out, the 2nd Amendment doesn't grant us the right to bear arms. The 2nd Amendment tells government not to infringe on our right to bear arms!!! It's a law restricting the government that essentially tells them to fuck off!!!
[–] FederalShill 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
There is no peaceful solution.
Buy a gun.
[–] HiJoker 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
That's some bullshit, they're glossing over the first as well. The congress shall make no laws respecting religion. That means 'pertaining to' religion. They can't tax it, they can't tell it what to do, jack shit. This is one big fat nigger jew power grab in itself.
We need to hang traitors for this.
[–] FridayJones 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
"Well-regulated" in those days meant "expertly practiced." The Federalist Papers tell us the exact intent of the wording of the Second Amendment, which is to ensure that the People are allowed to possess firearms, in order that they will be familiar with their use and operation in the event of an armed conflict, and to allow the People to enforce the Constitution even on members of the government if necessary, by popular revolt.
[–] beefartist ago
This very idea is still encoded into US military, isn't it? (Swearing to constitution vs head of state) and being allowed to ignore unconstitutional orders?
[–] heywoodnj 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
A kid reading this will take this as gospel because they read it in a sanctified school book and call you a liar when you try to correct them.
This is political indoctrination like most of the curriculum thees days.
@ u/dan_east do you have the name and publisher of this textbook? I want to piss in their cheerios.
[–] WillowsRecipe 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
From 2013. No idea if still current
https://www.activistpost.com/2013/09/ap-history-textbook-that-altered-2nd.html
[–] heywoodnj ago
Thank you. Interesting site, book-marked.
[–] dan_east [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Unfortunately I do not. Publisher might be McGraw Hill, but I'm not 100% on that.