[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] toobaditworks 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

They have mandatory service in their army. And they all have guns.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

2
21

[–] Aranarth_Dunedain 2 points 21 points (+23|-2) ago 

This is why you must teach the young that being armed isn't unusual, that it's part of being an American, and what responsible adults do.

0
0

[–] antiliberalsociety ago 

George Wallace was a good teacher.

Let me suggest that you go to your library...

0
1

[–] whatisbestinlife 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

SO? let them eat their hat and go start a state militia. your militia will have a rep and eventually we will have a peoples militia rep standing beside the president. THIS IS THE ONLY WAY TO NOT DIE FROM 3RD WORLD INVASION

0
4

[–] toobaditworks 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

This is to teach them they don't have the right to own a gun and then eventually ban guns from the ignorant people.

0
2

[–] whatisbestinlife 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

well luckily their opposition still exists (like us) and the kids can still find actualities written down from other sources like libraries. not that libraries arent completely controlled and are slowly destroying copies of a once written history and are helping to control and write the future narrative

0
18

[–] bfriend13 0 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago 

Separation of church and state for the 1st isn't there either.

4
-4

2
1

[–] Broc_Lia 2 points 1 point (+3|-2) ago 

It is. Last line:

Congress may not favour one religion over another (separation of church and state)

Granted that's the supreme court interpretation rather than the actual text, but it's still there at least.

0
6

[–] 22597568? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

It’s not in the actual text is what he’s saying

0
72

[–] undertheshills 0 points 72 points (+72|-0) ago  (edited ago)

a state militia is an oxymoron. Militias by definition are non paid, unprofessional soldiers. If youre required to register and work under the command of a government you are no longer a militia. The militia portion of the 2nd amendment exists to protect gun owners rights to organize and train in independent groups. It goes further to unnecessarily add that militias are necessary to the security of a free State. Learn a fucking word educators.

1
0

[–] Chimaira92 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

unprofessional soldiers.

That's the only point I would argue is up for debate with your comment. They still encourage people to train up with military tactics or at least thats what I gathered from the term "regulated civilian militia"

0
1

[–] Locked_Account 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The militia part of the 2nd also protects individuals not associated with any group. They are still potential future militia members.

If the call for a militia goes out in a time of crisis, you want citizenry able to take up the fight/enforce security who are familiar with the weapons which they must use immediately in the emergency- you can't pause and train when it is time to fight.

Would be super handy if they could bring their own guns and ammo too.

0
0

[–] NEWCON ago 

Similar to the taxpayer getting free government money

1
3

[–] Phantom42 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

unprofessional

I guarantee I fight better than your average spic or nigger in the military.

0
0

[–] undertheshills ago 

Its not an insult it just means being a soldier isn't your full time job

1
-1

[–] beefartist 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

You run your mouth just like one too

0
4

[–] lanre 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Yeah, I used to be confused about how rag-tag bands could win wars vs much stronger powers. Now, not so much.

1 reply

1
13

[–] ForgottenMemes 1 point 13 points (+14|-1) ago  (edited ago)

10 U.S.C. § 311 Militia:  composition and classes

The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age

Whoa, what's with the sexist book there? Are you saying women who are totally equal to men in all ways can't have guns?

5
7

[–] Drkadrka 5 points 7 points (+12|-5) ago 

No, women can have guns. The right of self defense is an inate human right.

Spics, Niggers, and Jews on the other hand, are subhumans, and should not be permitted to have firearms because they are untrustworthy and prone to mental illness and violent outbursts.

5
5

[–] GeorgeWashingNigger 5 points 5 points (+10|-5) ago  (edited ago)

you just described women tho

0
6

[–] cyclops1771 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Yeah, that keeps being ignored - rights aren't "granted" by the Bill of Rights. These were rights that exist to all people regardless of any document. Madison just knew that things were going to go off the rails eventually, and we better get a few of the most important ones listed.

0
2

[–] Bolux 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Looks like they missed out a couple of things