[–] GreenSlug 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
But what defines "people" has drastically changed. White men are people. All else is either a lower animal or property. People who are not white men do not have the same rights for a reason, they can not be trusted with the same level of responsibility as white men. God designed and declared it so
[–] cyclops1771 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
That's a way to view it. Personally, the issue isn't Negroes with guns, it's Negroes thinking that they are special. It's the attitude, not the weapon.
[–] beefartist 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Your issue is that you don't see the irony in granting a bunch of people (admittedly on average "better" people) rights because of the colour of their skin. Not all whites deserve rights and the very idea of (((whites))) wasn't really around. All of the people involved were homogeneous not just by pigment but they were all ex-Englishmen or identified as English. If we weren't so mutted up we would still be calling ourselves "Polish" or "German", etc...not white
[–] beefartist ago
You guys are talking about GOD given rights...why don't you express it that way.
[–] cyclops1771 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Call them whatever you want to call them. God-given, Natural rights, Human rights, Rights of Man, Granted from our Creator. Doens't matter which to me, it's all the same thing.
Labeling it to a specific narrow view of "Hebrew God Only" lessens the universal impact of the concept of "rights".
[–] EyeOfHorus 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Exactly, BoR is redundant statement of our rights.
[–] beefartist ago
It isn't if you intend to remove God from government