8
-6

0
2

[–] con77 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

DAYUM!

0
1

[–] HiJoker 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Let's play devil's advocate here, you being Twitter.

So, do you think banning a guy with a 184 IQ off the platform because his views annoy you and your ilk is a good idea or not? Addendum: Was letting him back on a good idea? Would you not think he'd be a bit pissed off? Do you think he might give some thought into what he's about to drop on you?


So is he:

A. Fucking right.

B. Taking trolling to an artform.

C. All of the above.

1
0

[–] ManchesterT 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

184? Any proof?

0
10

[–] BizarellyNormal 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Holy shit, even through pictures you can see the fucking crazy eyes and expression. The same soul-devoid, aggressive and just plain evil stare you’d expect from satan itself. Scary shit indeed.

0
1

[–] Ducktalesooo000ooo 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Not scary enough for executive law enforcement agencies, but yea... let’s celebrate vicariously by talking about how she looks

She’s fuckin awful looking yea

0
4

[–] prairie 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I guess that picture is after her recent plastic surgery. Trying to find a photo on jewpedia I see that the email corruption is referred to as the email controversy. Gotta love the spin.

0
2

[–] steven_feelsperg 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Jews frame anything they don't like as controversy. The worst part is normies implicitly accept the jewish perspective as baseline and opposition as detrimental. Being a herd follower, controversy is turbulent, scary, and therefore avoided.