I think it will be Bush, no one would expect it since he was so well liked. But when they hear how he covered 911 for his father and all his cohorts it will be very shocking. That was a time when America came together and gave the Government most of our power. Since 911 the GOVERNMENT has done what ever they wanted. Where were the WMD in Iraq? When to war because Bush convinced the public Iraq did have WMD when they did not. This is my pick, I could care less about the MSM.
Do I understand that you are basing your theory on the fact that arresting media personnel will be shocking in a visibility sense, since these ppl are on tv everyday etc? And that the narrative establishers would not have a script ready for an event like arresting a media figure, as they would in the event of a politician being the initial arrest?
It is more of a hypothesis where I'm speculating since a theory needs either compilation of supporting data or a testable experiment with results that can be duplicated. But yes, you've got most of it. A high-visibility arrestee; a straight-forward crime (like lying) that is easy to understand and not convoluted, and obvious enough that it cannot be easily blamed on something else; and a charge that, as you said, they would not have a script ready for it because it is so "unheard of" to make an arrest for reporting fake news, even though POTUS has been putting it out there in plain sight that Fake News ought to be held responsible for creating a clear and present danger.
Most speculation about the First Big Arrest has been a "Who?" "Who" is important, but not the top of the list. A sense of personal betrayal would cause a greater emotional response.
"That person deceived us!" The "that person" is somewhat interchangeable, but the deception was targeted directly at ME and my friends. Personal betrayal is more jarring than celebrity gossip; a good movie will have both the personal, visceral response and a starring celebrity. So that is the other part—an emotional realization that what they did wrong was actually harmful and dangerous to our life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
[–] 22504452? 3 points -3 points 0 points (+0|-3) ago
What if..Trump himself was the arrestee? Q didn't say WE wouldn't be shocked, but no matter how much the left screams for it, they would be shocked, too. It would force those of us behind our computers to go out into the light and really fight for the truth. 'They will fight, but you are ready'. We are armed with these years of digging and Q knowledge, and it would be the tipping point, the last indignity.
Heck, Trump has allowed investigations, slander, impeachment...all out attack. Why not arrest?