Do I understand that you are basing your theory on the fact that arresting media personnel will be shocking in a visibility sense, since these ppl are on tv everyday etc? And that the narrative establishers would not have a script ready for an event like arresting a media figure, as they would in the event of a politician being the initial arrest?
It is more of a hypothesis where I'm speculating since a theory needs either compilation of supporting data or a testable experiment with results that can be duplicated. But yes, you've got most of it. A high-visibility arrestee; a straight-forward crime (like lying) that is easy to understand and not convoluted, and obvious enough that it cannot be easily blamed on something else; and a charge that, as you said, they would not have a script ready for it because it is so "unheard of" to make an arrest for reporting fake news, even though POTUS has been putting it out there in plain sight that Fake News ought to be held responsible for creating a clear and present danger.
Most speculation about the First Big Arrest has been a "Who?" "Who" is important, but not the top of the list. A sense of personal betrayal would cause a greater emotional response.
"That person deceived us!" The "that person" is somewhat interchangeable, but the deception was targeted directly at ME and my friends. Personal betrayal is more jarring than celebrity gossip; a good movie will have both the personal, visceral response and a starring celebrity. So that is the other part—an emotional realization that what they did wrong was actually harmful and dangerous to our life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
You could be right.
Other possibilities that make some sense (IMHO):
1) George W. Bush (not a Democrat, no publicly-known involvement in either the "Muh Russia" hoax or the Ukraine hoax.)
2) Chief Justice Roberts (also not a democrat, and any claim that it was retribution for attacking Trump would be way too much of a stretch.) The only downside to Roberts is that, while we awaited a replacement on the Court, the balance of power would be 4-4.
[–] 22504889? ago (edited ago)
Clear and Present Danger is a book/movie.
"CIA Analyst Jack Ryan is drawn into an illegal war fought by the US government against a Colombian drug cartel."
Colombian Cartel = MS13
MS13 = MSM (mainstream media)
You may be spot on.
EDIT: THIS IS THE KIND OF DECODING SHIT THAT GETS MY BLOOD PUMPING!!! MORE MORE MORE
[–] 22504848? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
3717 - First indictment [unseal] will trigger mass pop awakening.
First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction.
They will fight but you are ready.
For the arrest / unsealing to lead to trigger mass awakening, imo, would need to be someone that people, regardless of politics, have strong feelings about.
Between the people in media, the coup plotters, and all, I suspect that there are still too strong of partisan emotions behind those people. The accusations would fly about political motivations, abuse of power and all.
There are so many possibilities that I couldn't make anything better than a guess, but Bush is high on the list.
Consider; he's republican, the left hates him, the right are supportive to ambivalent, something related to 9-11 would shake the population, would show that it's about targeting corruption over the party politics, and would demonstrate the direction to follow. That it's about rooting out evil, and not just 'politics'.
[–] 22504802? 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
This would be a terrible idea and would further alienate those under the spell already, possibly alienate those on the fence.
What could every American get behind, what could shock them into questioning everything?
Pizzagate arrests. The thing that the media said over and over was fake and nobody can defend or spin. I’m praying for this.
[–] 22505325? ago
The 2 that matter #1 Hussein’s #2 Hillary’s