[–] 22504528? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I disagree. Starting with the media is a bad move, it would have the opposite effect IMO. Right now Trump has the DS playing defense for the first time. His end around on Jessie Liu should be an indication where the effort is concentrated, its at the DOJ. Slowly chipping away at their credibility and winning hearts and minds that the DOJ was/is corrupt. The most actions have happened there, see the drops about DOJ with (FIRED). So my vote is the first big league arrests will be DOJ related.
Do I understand that you are basing your theory on the fact that arresting media personnel will be shocking in a visibility sense, since these ppl are on tv everyday etc? And that the narrative establishers would not have a script ready for an event like arresting a media figure, as they would in the event of a politician being the initial arrest?
It is more of a hypothesis where I'm speculating since a theory needs either compilation of supporting data or a testable experiment with results that can be duplicated. But yes, you've got most of it. A high-visibility arrestee; a straight-forward crime (like lying) that is easy to understand and not convoluted, and obvious enough that it cannot be easily blamed on something else; and a charge that, as you said, they would not have a script ready for it because it is so "unheard of" to make an arrest for reporting fake news, even though POTUS has been putting it out there in plain sight that Fake News ought to be held responsible for creating a clear and present danger.
Most speculation about the First Big Arrest has been a "Who?" "Who" is important, but not the top of the list. A sense of personal betrayal would cause a greater emotional response.
"That person deceived us!" The "that person" is somewhat interchangeable, but the deception was targeted directly at ME and my friends. Personal betrayal is more jarring than celebrity gossip; a good movie will have both the personal, visceral response and a starring celebrity. So that is the other part—an emotional realization that what they did wrong was actually harmful and dangerous to our life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
[–] 22503882? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Q is mostly right. The one thing he didn't mention in that post is how the masses respond to pre-programming. The goal of the puppetmasters is not just temporary action/reaction responses to stimulus, although they definately want that. Their ultimate goal is absolute totalitarian mind slavery of the masses. That level of slavery requires years of pre-conditioning so that when a specific stimulus is inserted, a highly predictible response matrix will unfold.
The enemy needs every man, woman, and child to do more than jump when the enemy says jump. The enemy needs the masses to jump on the heads of their neighbors, find any one not jumping and kick them in the air, then shame and demonize to the 9th pit of hell all non-jumpers when the puppetmasters say jump.
[–] 22504889? ago (edited ago)
Clear and Present Danger is a book/movie.
"CIA Analyst Jack Ryan is drawn into an illegal war fought by the US government against a Colombian drug cartel."
Colombian Cartel = MS13
MS13 = MSM (mainstream media)
You may be spot on.
EDIT: THIS IS THE KIND OF DECODING SHIT THAT GETS MY BLOOD PUMPING!!! MORE MORE MORE
I think it will be Bush, no one would expect it since he was so well liked. But when they hear how he covered 911 for his father and all his cohorts it will be very shocking. That was a time when America came together and gave the Government most of our power. Since 911 the GOVERNMENT has done what ever they wanted. Where were the WMD in Iraq? When to war because Bush convinced the public Iraq did have WMD when they did not. This is my pick, I could care less about the MSM.
[–] 22504131? ago
I think it will be GWBush, war criminal and trasher of the Constitution .
[–] 22504154? ago
What will the CNN and MSDNC hacks say when the prior object of their scorn and hatred is brought low.