[–] 22419881? 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
"Private organizations" are incentivized to make money. In fact, they have no obligation to do anything else other than to increase value for stockholders. Legitimate government exists to protect the rights of the individual. When government is illegitimate/coopted/occupied, it ceases to serve its only legitimate function, puts on a short skirt, hooker boots, lipstick, and starts selling itself to the highest bidder.
Government is the disease posing as the cure. Communists favorite tactics are divide and conquer, and endless lies. Not just lying like claiming they're not the ones guilty of their crimes, but to claim those seeking justice for their crimes, or those standing in the way of their crimes, as the guilty party.
If a private organization is behaving criminally, legitimate government would put a stop to it, and bring those responsible to justice. If private organizations are behaving lawfully, but shittily, then it's the right of those in society to boycott the organization, and ostracize those involved. In fact, no one has the right to prohibit boycotting, or ostracization.
What does government have to say about your right and duty to boycott shitheads? What does government have to say about your ability to use gold &/or silver, or any other medium of exchange you want, as money? The law and restrictions on government says it's none of their damn business, and that congress is only allowed to coin gold or silver.. Yet government compels the acceptance of the most evil private organization that ever existed, the Federal Reserve Bank.
If corrupt government is selling unfair advantages, it will eliminate businesses that would compete lawfully.
Don't like an organization? Boycott it, and ostracize those individuals involved. No one has the right to stop you. However, crime being ignored or enabled is a crime, and you have the right and duty to put an end to that by any means.
Justice is supposedly the responsibility of those in government (it's actually each of our responsibility). Don't be their useful idiots. Strike the root!
https://www.harrybrowne.org/articles/PrinciplesOfGovernment.htm
[–] 22421060? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
“Don't like an organization? Boycott it,”
The problem is that many are being tricked into liking something by having it presented to them in a false way. So ppl are not able to make a proper decision. Thomas Jefferson wrote that a well-informed electorate is a prerequisite to democracy and at this time, we do not have that in America. So I say, how can we properly organize against something that is evil if many of our fellow Americans don’t know it? Who’s going to tell them? The msm? Many can’t look for themselves, they have just enough time to work themselves to death and provide a life for their family. Too busy by design.
[–] 22421212? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Bababababingo. Now check this pile of stink. 30 or so States have laws that the Electors of the Pres. and Vice Pres. Must vote for the candidate from the Organization the Elector was nominated by. State laws demanding free American citizens must vote for the Organizations choice not the free American Electors choice. Protection racketeering anyone?
[–] 22449397? [S] ago (edited ago)
They are licensed the the sec of state of the state in which they are incorporated. Where does THAT sec state get their power? the state constitution. where does the state constitution get its authority / jurisdiction? the consittution of the united states of america. Where does the constitution of the united state of america get its authority from (the collective) YOU and from GOD, through the principles of
1) the social contract; and
2) popular (collective) consent
3) the etymology of the words "DO ORDAIN" in the preamble, as part of teh contract. This implies GOD as it turns the Ordain-er (ie: each person implied in teh contract...aka citizens of the united states), into MINISTERS OF GOD / HIGHER POWER...yep. Each one of us.
This also turns the documents, it's creation, ratification and popular acceptance / consent into "a sacred rite", and the document also becomes a "Holy document"
I'm not making this up. WORDS MATTER. don't use Ordain if you don't believe the document is sacred, holy and magical
Now it gets more complicated. Contract law. corporations are subject to contract law...where does contract law get its authority? Probably form Courts of England, because contract law and civil law (common law) and law of obligations, whose authority is in England
Yep.
It's arguable that the constituton being a contract is ALSO subject to obligation law (roman law) and possilby maritime admiralty law
but that's a rabbit hole I'll let constituional scholars go after if they are courageous and honest
[–] 22419728? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
USA INC. is a private corporation that owes the trillions of fake debt. The USA )FREE CITIZEN( owes NOTHING.
Jews LIE, fight and hide this truth, DAILY
[YOUR NAME] in capital letters isn't you, it's your straw representative in USA INC. unless you withdraw.
only fools spell their name in capital letters
[–] 22426552? ago (edited ago)
Hillary's completely controls "communications, data, analytics and research at the DNC. They would have joint authority with DNC over strategic decisions over the staffing, budget, and expenditures.".
Copy of the secret agreement, secret memo, diagram exposing Hillary's DNC strategy, photo & source at https://www.minds.com/Francewhoa/blog/33-percent-of-your-donations-to-democrats-go-to-hillary-clin-905939944115150848
Source
• Source 1 Hillary Clinton's SECRET memo in 2015 at at https://www.scribd.com/document/363469116/DNCMemo-Hillary-Clinton-Camp-Given-Control-Over-Party-in-August-2015
• Archived article part 1 of 2 at https:// archive.today/Ewv9G
• Source 2 Hillary Clinton's SECRET memo in 2015 https://www.npr.org/2017/11/03/561976645/clinton-campaign-had-additional-signed-agreement-with-dnc-in-2015
• Archived article part 1 of 2 at https:// archive.today/C1bw8
[–] 22420196? 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Reading this truly illustrates my ignorance. To hear that "legal" interpretation. Our so called political system is a total and complete farcé.
The worst is I dont find this surprising.
Back to lurking, seems to be that there is always that particular perspective or view point that simply changes the way things are seen and defined.
[–] 22421810? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
It's not the political system itself, it's the organizations behind pushing the candidates they want. The politicians don't have a choice.
ANYONE could create a corporation to organize voting and push the narrative just as well as the RNC or DNC does. There's tons of free online tools (youtube etc), you just need a group of people with the time and effort.
If enough people get on board and vote for the candidates you are pushing, the RNC/DNC would eventually get pushed to the side. There's more to it, and it might not work the first time, but waking people up to the scam would be a monumental shift.