2
-2

[–] 22419797? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

I’m pretty sure neither of those organizations are corporations.

1
0

[–] 22420013? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I'm pretty sure you should look into this before you make any more assumptions. OP is spot-on.

1
-1

[–] 22420099? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

hi (((OP)))!

you're not that pretty

Epstein can give you a nose job in his basement ;)

0
5

[–] 22419818? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

You are too cute, sweetie.

0
0

[–] 22419853? ago  (edited ago)

^^^^ "THIS is awesome!" -Pepe

3
-1

[–] 22420495? 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

Why are you screaming into an echo chamber? Go to mf reddit.

0
5

[–] 22420679? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Their post was much more useful than yours.

I'd say you belong on reddit, not them.

1
-1

[–] 22421253? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

There was no need to remind the ~400 users on QRV of this. It's completely absurd.

0
0

[–] 22433934? ago 

There is no need for either party.

The only criteria for every candidate should be how well they articulate defending the Constitution, and its principles.

0
0

[–] 22426552? ago  (edited ago)

Hillary Clinton bought control of most of the DNC in 2015

Hillary's completely controls "communications, data, analytics and research at the DNC. They would have joint authority with DNC over strategic decisions over the staffing, budget, and expenditures.".

Copy of the secret agreement, secret memo, diagram exposing Hillary's DNC strategy, photo & source at https://www.minds.com/Francewhoa/blog/33-percent-of-your-donations-to-democrats-go-to-hillary-clin-905939944115150848

Source

• Source 1 Hillary Clinton's SECRET memo in 2015 at at https://www.scribd.com/document/363469116/DNCMemo-Hillary-Clinton-Camp-Given-Control-Over-Party-in-August-2015

• Archived article part 1 of 2 at https:// archive.today/Ewv9G

• Source 2 Hillary Clinton's SECRET memo in 2015 https://www.npr.org/2017/11/03/561976645/clinton-campaign-had-additional-signed-agreement-with-dnc-in-2015

• Archived article part 1 of 2 at https:// archive.today/C1bw8

0
0

[–] 22421620? ago 

Iowa: This is a backdoor attempt to eliminate the Electoral College. One of dozens they will try, in hopes one will break through and force down the EC.

0
0

[–] 22421590? ago 

Simple solution: the Democrats have failed to qualify to have a slate of electors in Iowa.

0
0

[–] 22421572? ago 

Government run primaries are unconstitutional.

0
0

[–] 22420395? ago 

Private corporation just means not run by the government. Which makes sense, if you spend a few minutes thinking about it. Do you really want the government deciding who gets elected? Both committees pretty much have to be incorporated due to the amount of money that flows through them. They can't exactly register are charities, now can they?

Or to put it another way, if they shouldn't be private corporations, what should they be registered as?

0
0

[–] 22421096? ago  (edited ago)

Can’t they register as a non profit organization? Any community, fraternal etc organization can be a 501c3. A foundation for instance. I know many folks who have died too early from say, drugs and a family member started a foundation in their name in order to raise money for drug awareness etc. couldn’t the same be done with political parties?

0
1

[–] 22422828? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Nope. There are specific limits on what a "nonprofit" can do. Especially a 501c3. Political campaigning is expressly forbidden. As is lobbying.

Corporation is an umbrella term that covers a LOT of types of organizations. A 501c3 falls under the legal definition of corporation. As do most tax exempt churches. Any time there is a sizeable group of people doing something with money involved, they are probably incorporated in some manor. The title corporation doesn't mean "money making business". Although most corporations do turn a profit.

load more comments ▼ (7 remaining)