[–] Guy_Justsome 0 points 15 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago
I'd say she's entitled to all of the winnings, because (1) she would have been SOL if he had lost the bet - all or nothing baby, and (2) the thief is entitled to none of what he stole - law cannot reward crime.
[–] WeekendBaker 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Stolen goods means the purchase was illegal and invalid
[–] Theyeatingtheirshit 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
In a civilized country? She should get back her $10,000 plus interest that would be earned by however it was being used at the time. In a bank? She gets $10,000.45. In her mattress? She gets $9,999.12 for inflation and the money that would have been chewed by rats.
In the US, though, she may get $10,000, and the local agencies (PD, DA, etc.) seize the $100,000,000 he won and split it between them.
[–] CaesarisAstrum ago
Probably same species. Definitely not same subspecies obviously.
[–] MassTooter 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Here is the story. Click through and read the comments. Very strange.
[–] QuickFYI 0 points 18 points 18 points (+18|-0) ago
Wakandans exchanging toilet paper