[–] cabalstone [S] 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
"No one is above the law" --Nancy Pelosi 12-5-2019
Alinsky Rule 4: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
[–] [deleted] 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
[–] cabalstone [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Chill, Cro. They sent Al Capone to Alcatraz for the petty crime of tax evasion instead of all the more serious crimes he so blatantly committed. The end result was the same...he died in prison. Certainly there are bigger fish to fry and more outrageous treachery and treason to consider, but sometimes the little things are worthy of a thought and a grin.
[–] cabalstone [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Of course it's not going to happen, QA. It's useful and entertaining however to highlight yet another instance of leftish hypocracy.
[–] G45Colt_II 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
3 years in prison for destroying official documents. Might be a good place for her to wait while the rest of the evidence against her is gathered up.
The necessary measure of protection for government documents and records is provided by 18 U.S.C. § 2071. Section 2071(a) contains a broad prohibition against destruction of government records or attempts to destroy such records. This section provides that whoever: willfully and unlawfully; conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates or destroys; or attempts to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; or carries away with intent to conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate or destroy; any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document or other thing deposited in any public office may be punished by imprisonment for three years, a $2, 000 fine, or both.
There are several important aspects to this offense. First, it is a specific intent crime. This means that the defendant must act intentionally with knowledge that he is violating the law. See United States v. Simpson, 460 F.2d 515, 518 (9th Cir. 1972). Moreover, one case has suggested that this specific intent requires that the defendant know that the documents involved are public records. See United States v. DeGroat, 30 F. 764, 765 (E.D.Mich. 1887).
[–] Cloudrdr ago
Is that a hill you think is worth dying on?
[–] cabalstone [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
No. It's just another round in the magazine.