[–] Tsilent_Tsunami 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Notice: This bill is SPURIOUS! To avoid additional interest and penalties, please forward the total show below immediately!
[–] dubmon3y 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
My parents owned a small business for decades. This is VERY common. The sad part was we would get billed by companies whom we had a good business relationship with. Nothing more profitible than a person who pays their bills religiously. Remember that goy.
[–] TestForScience 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
So they wont pay their taxes but will pay other random bills....?
[–] Creggieb 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Fuck that, if I get a bill that I shouldnt have to pay, I still have to pay it, or risk bad credit and collections. It's on me to work backwards and get the bill cancelled and/or refunded, and I dont get a penny for my time.
They should be out every last cent If they cant be arsed to compare P.O. to accounts payable
[–] Reverse-Flash [S] 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago
The last person I gave one to accepted it, so, so far so good.
[–] babysnatcher666 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
So feel free to give me the ones you don't want.
[–] CowWithBeef 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
He's saying the dollar is backed by public acceptance which is still in place. I would add that it's also backed by government violence if you don't pay your tax obligations with dollars. It's not a coincidence that the fed was passed at about the same time as the income tax. It's also not a coincidence that they've pretty much abandoned the use of amendments to the constitution since those passed.
[–] Tsilent_Tsunami 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Norton issued his own money in the form of scrips which were accepted from him by restaurants in San Francisco.[44] These notes came in denominations between fifty cents and ten dollars, and the few surviving notes are collector's items.
If you're not familiar with this guy who declared himself emperor of San Francisco, read this. Sorry about the link.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
Definitely. Maybe plus a little Mercantile. Either way, though, the relation they present is horribly contradictory. Showing a picture of him getting caught and then saying his Sneak is maxed out is like showing him shooting arrows that keep missing and saying his Marksman is maxed out. That's...that's just not how it works.
[–] Computergeek01 ago
It's called "Theft by Deception" and is a form of fraud. Yes, it is illegal.
[–] MikeyMo123 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
They probably put a "false-pretenses" or some bullshit like that on there.
[–] jesuisgoy 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
If the bills were fraudulent, I. E. asked payment for services/products that were never delivered, then yes it is theft. But if he managed it well, e.g. made perfectly clear that the unsolicited service was actually paying own rent, then it is purely an error of the company's accountant.
[–] Tsilent_Tsunami 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Notice: This bill is SPURIOUS! To remain in good standing, please forward the total show below immediately!
[–] Jimmycrackerson 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago (edited ago)
He should have said he was charging them for all his personal information that they got from him.
[–] bdmthrfkr 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Post a link please, this is killing me!
[–] Reverse-Flash [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Try this.
[–] bdmthrfkr 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
I like this guy.