[–] Broc_Lia 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
I call bullshit. He has never demonstrated any commitment to free speech in the past, so if he's virtue signalling for it now it means there's fuckery afoot.
This combined with those articles the other day accusing him of being allied to Trump (lol) makes me suspicious.
What articles? Personally I suspect he may be influenced by Peter Thiel. He's known him for many years and there's a similarity in how they speak. Maybe it's the somewhat robotic mannerisms, I don't know. I think it is more than that though, he backed facebook early on and may have been one of the first investors and consequently likely mentored Mark Zuckerberg.
Thiel was an early backer of Facebook and became a close adviser to Zuckerberg on raising money, weighing acquisitions and taking risks.
As Zuckerberg recalled in one recent interview with Altman, "Peter was the person who told me this really pithy quote: 'In a world that's changing so quickly, the biggest risk you can take is not taking any risk.' "
Thiel spoke up for trump before the election.
He resisted turning on thiel back in 2016
Either Thiel or the principle of diversity of opinion is important to him. Thiel came out against leftist identity politics in the 90's and gave a really forward thinking speech.
[–] geovoat 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
This is the leading theory.
The schumer Epstein one is Israel first and wants to destroy the USA as any source of power. or resistance.
The trump led one wants to keep the USA strong and not destroy the Anglo power it has here while still putting Israel first.
The first one has been running things for decades.
The second one just began to say no we want to keep the USA and recruited Trump. Now maybe as Trumps power base succeeds some may be switching to Trump.
[–] canbot 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I think it is simply two powerful Jews who disagree on how the goy should be controlled. Zuckerberg probably thinks that the fascist control method will lead to rebellion and ultimately the downfall of Facebook. Soros thinks that a united front across all platforms is required and if Zuck gets soft it will be a chink in the armor. He doesn't care if Facebook falls as long as they fall pushing the narrative. Like many dictators Soros thinks he can quell any rebellion with an iron fist. Zuck wants to try a softer approach.
[–] CaptnObvius 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
you know what that means anons, if its real, its time for red pill memes 24/7/365
[–] Sheeitpost 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Good. Zuckerberg recognizes that if post-modernism wins his platform and voice are gone because they're blaming him for Trump in 2016 now. They may be liberal but they are trying not to be post-modernist so good for them.
[–] romanstock 0 points 13 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago
yeah yeah all the tech clowns have said this crap before