0
0

[–] zuck [S] ago 

Peter Thiel jr

0
4

[–] Sheeitpost 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Good. Zuckerberg recognizes that if post-modernism wins his platform and voice are gone because they're blaming him for Trump in 2016 now. They may be liberal but they are trying not to be post-modernist so good for them.

0
0

[–] BitChuteArchive ago 

0
1

[–] derram 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

https://archive.ph/wip/hn2n6 :

2020-02-01 | Mark Zuckerberg declares Facebook is going to 'stand up for free expression' | Daily Mail Online

"Mark Zuckerberg has declared that Facebook is 'going to stand up for free expression' in spite of the fact it will 'piss off a lot of people'.", "He then declared: 'This is the new approach [free expression], and I think it's going to p**s off a lot of people."

'Zuckerberg has promised Facebook users privacy upgrades in light of the outcome of the suit, as the founder seeks to address the ongoing privacy concerns that have dogged the social media company'

'The controversial CEO, 35, made the claim during a fiery appearance at the Silicon Slopes Tech Summit in Utah on Friday. ', "Meanwhile, Zuckerberg's defiant appearance at the Utah tech summit came after Facebook disappointed Wall Street's expectations of fourth quarter growth earlier this week."


This has been an automated message.

0
4

[–] UglyMugly 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

That's interesting considering I've had a couple 24 hour time outs recently for mean words...so this only applies to THEM being able to speak freely, right?

0
3

[–] kammmmak 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Where's the babylonbee link

0
7

[–] ardvarcus 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Fuck the Zuck. He needs to be keelhauled.

0
0

[–] InClownWorldSellPnut ago 

keelhauled

TIL

0
7

[–] canbot 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Oh, so this is why Soros started saying that Zukerberg has too much control with facebook.

0
0

[–] 22347690? ago 

Kinda counter intuitive no?

0
1

[–] watts2db 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

are there two kike mafias at war or is this all show

0
1

[–] canbot 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I think it is simply two powerful Jews who disagree on how the goy should be controlled. Zuckerberg probably thinks that the fascist control method will lead to rebellion and ultimately the downfall of Facebook. Soros thinks that a united front across all platforms is required and if Zuck gets soft it will be a chink in the armor. He doesn't care if Facebook falls as long as they fall pushing the narrative. Like many dictators Soros thinks he can quell any rebellion with an iron fist. Zuck wants to try a softer approach.

0
1

[–] geovoat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This is the leading theory.

The schumer Epstein one is Israel first and wants to destroy the USA as any source of power. or resistance.

The trump led one wants to keep the USA strong and not destroy the Anglo power it has here while still putting Israel first.

The first one has been running things for decades.

The second one just began to say no we want to keep the USA and recruited Trump. Now maybe as Trumps power base succeeds some may be switching to Trump.

load more comments ▼ (20 remaining)