0
2

[–] 22319054? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

  1. Because 17. Heellloooooooo
  2. Agree

0
0

[–] 22322487? ago 

What an amazing "Qproof"

0
1

[–] 22325158? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

We are watching a show. Trust the Plan,

0
1

[–] 22322247? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

"Nothing to see here. Move along. It's all a distraction. Just a conspiracy theory." Shifty Schiff

(wink, wink)

0
1

[–] 22320613? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Fortunately, Rand’s question was ultimately asked by other senators with EC’s name removed. Schooler: Schiff couldn’t answer the question.

0
1

[–] 22319821? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

How do you introduce evidence - names, players?

0
0

[–] 22320517? ago 

Get Democrats to demand it. For instance, Bolton’s manuscript would be a perfect conduit for classified info, if he wasn’t DS.

0
4

[–] 22321030? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I doubt Bolton knows exactly what is in "his" book.

These payoff books are written to justify a payoff. I'm sure the books aren't the product of the person named on the cover...

Or maybe he was just "helped' along with it...

0
0

[–] 22324774? ago 

I think they dont bring this stuff up much because they know they dont have any physical evidence, such as documents, because both subjects are part of ongoing investigations.

0
0

[–] 22324150? ago 

Something is acock around here

0
0

[–] 22322647? ago 

I believe...maybe wrong...thay they aren't bringing up #18 (IG) during the trial because it would force new evidence which would open the door to any other new evidence. Just spit ballin'...

load more comments ▼ (19 remaining)