0
5

[–] 22317442? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Slightly off topic, but don't have a place to discuss, so I'll do it here.

We read from Q "Patriots are in control" and "We have it all", but I don't think people really understand what that means.

While "patriots are in control", they do not control the time it takes for the opponents moves.

Let me use an analogy. There are two players in a game of chess, and even when one player has complete control of the game, he still must allow the opponent to make his moves and he has to wait for the opposing player to do so. The moves of the opposing player are what allow his strategy to work. So, for those that do not have patience, remember, like a chess game, both sides get to make their moves and the game must play out, but the time it takes to play the game is not under the control of a single player. We may dictate the moves, but we have to allow the opposition to make their moves, and in this case, there is no time clock. It happens when it happens.

Second issue, "we have everything", does not mean you can just run out and arrest everyone. That is a simpletons fantasy. The legal process takes time, and we are attempting to re-establish law and order in this country. Anything short of returning this country to following Constitutional law will result in a bad outcome. It could fail, people will walk, civil war breaks out, the DS survives and re-establishes itself, the list goes on with reasons why this plan has to be implemented the correct way. Yes, it takes time, but it will be a final outcome we will be happy with and proud of, so be patient, as painful as it may be to sit and watch it slowly play out.

1
0

[–] 22317580? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Oh and that's why everyone is jizzing themselves over the 53 exclamation points and how that's going to prove the senate is going to vote 53-47 to acquit tomorrow because of a post made 2 years ago. Same with how Q just knew the exact date of brexit a couple years prior. The confirmation bias is real.

0
0

[–] 22319486? ago 

56 but yeah

0
0

[–] 22319025? ago 

Oh yeah, we're as bad as everyone on reddit or twitter or any other platform, but we are winning.

0
0

[–] 22317462? ago 

Great analysis, anon. ThanQ!

0
5

[–] 22316584? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Q Army = Army of God

0
1

[–] 22317983? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Yes. That's right.

0
4

[–] 22317701? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Why anons? Another thought is they cannot come after anons. The left loves to put a name on a pedestal then demonize them. Now they have no one to demonize except Q as a conspiracy theory. And msm demonizing Q only makes the movement stronger.

0
2

[–] 22320983? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It’s funny listening to the children scream..”but it’s been two and a half years, nothing will ever happen...”.

Never mind we’re actually talking about wrapping up an event that began roughly 250,000 years ago when the Annunaki descended upon our planet... 😂.

Small minds carry small ideas.

0
1

[–] 22321018? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Hell of a perspective. You are correct that we are living out the legacy of actions carried out in antiquity. 2000 years ago for sure. Trump had nothing to do with any of it. He has exposed a lot of mid level goons but I don't think any of the real demons have been threatened. The bloodline families stay out of the "news". When they start to be taken out, then we are on track to free this planet.

0
0

[–] 22349200? ago 

The bloodline handlers are already removed... did you bat an eye? :) The bloodlines themselves are merely rats in a sinking ship. Their only power is projection. We the sheeple are awakening.

0
2

[–] 22317856? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

That's PERFECT Sir.

And finally, why anons? So that not one person or entity takes credit. So that we continually talk about The People rather than so and so. So that the focus goes to POTUS and so that his actions are evident

No one should get credit except The President and God.

Anons can stay Anons.

To talk about it, ain't about it. <

Write that down.

0
2

[–] 22319823? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Noice penultimate sentence!!! Reminds me of "Hey, Jill!" a song by obscure band, The Strawberry Zots.

I actually went looking for it a few months ago, but couldn't find it. Did find a live performance they did in a parking lot! It was all cover songs though, not any of their originals. The only album of theirs I own is "Cars, Flowers, Telephones" from 1989, got it in college. Really enjoyed it!

Their one-hour parking lot gig: https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=UgueNKU_8Nw

Hey Jill: https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=JVQ07afWXC4

The part that it reminded me of (kek, can't find the lyrics in a search, so I'll "just have to" :) listen to the song again, and transcribe) -- okay, it's at 2:58; emphasis, mine:

Narrator: Hey Jill, what's the meaning of life?

Jill: Wellll, it's not really the generalization, that comes from an all-encompassing perception, of what is thought to be known. Rather, it seems to be an individual's, relative perception of details. Let me explain it logically. If I am thinking of something, say A, then my attention is directed at A. It is A which is the intentional object. My intention is obviously not directed at my thinking of A; when I am thinking of A, it is not my thinking of A which is the intentional object, but as already mentioned, A! If the intentional object was my thinking of A, I would not be thinking of A, I'd be thinking of my thinking of A, which means that I would not be thinking of A at all! Without concepts, there would be nothing we could be conscious of. Nothing we could think of, or doubt; nothing we could hear or see. Because it is with the help of concepts that we identify things as being [???] at. I could not think, for instance, of a book without having the concept, "book". Which implies that I'm able to use expressions, containing the word "book." It is not a logical necessity [end]

Had to use headphones to get the complete ending, which I don't think I've ever actually heard in full, previously! I really loved this when exposed to it randomly back in college days; and, thank you for the memories! :) ≤

0
1

[–] 22324599? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Last Night A DJ SaVed My Life. <>

https://youtu.be/Agn0mWEiF-Y

0
1

[–] 22324559? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Thanks for your reply.

Getting hungry. Kinda Sick of PoPcorn (I will keep it ready for The Show). When do we get to eat some Steak? ;)

0
1

[–] 22324547? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

0
0

[–] 22324573? ago  (edited ago)

https://youtu.be/30pt2XUJKGQ

Upside Down... The more you Turn me... Inside out, AND, Round & Round. <

0
2

[–] 22316397? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Frens saving America

1
1

[–] 22316478? 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

FREN = Far Right Ethno Nationalist

1
0

[–] 22316559? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Thx rabbi

0
0

[–] 22318067? ago 

[F]

0
1

[–] 22326071? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Anonymous eyes and ears everywhere.. sounds like an Orwellian dystopia. The only difference is, do you have the moral fibre to do right?

0
1

[–] 22321935? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

well said!

The concept of "Anons" is genius!

Because then [they] can try to shill, but they cannot occupy the movement by installing an own charismatic leader figure.

(as most honest movements in the past got occupied by some cabal fag at some point - and were pushed into some NWO-direction)

The Army of Anons will not accept any "leader" telling rubbish.

We saw how Corsi or Alex Jones got exposed. They do not play a role anymore.

And, yes, there are still shills and people spreading bullshit... but the "intelligence of the masses of anons" expose the shills quickly!

And as we do not need any leaders, we are not "following the stars". The cabal just cannot hijack this movement.

We are leaders ourselves.

WWG1WGA.

0
0

[–] 22349233? ago 

We are Anonymous. We are Legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect Us.

0
0

[–] 22349221? ago 

We are the awakening human collective consciousness. Welcome to this side of the rabbit hole.

load more comments ▼ (47 remaining)