0
25

[–] SeemsReasonable 0 points 25 points (+25|-0) ago 

US Government will say: "Fuck you we do what we want."

0
12

[–] smeezekitty 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

Probably so. But it is still better to have this ruling than not

0
5

[–] SeemsReasonable 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Very true. There's always a first step.

0
4

[–] Monologger 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Nah, they'll just ask the secret court that agrees to 99% of warrants.

0
12

[–] forgetmyname 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

ITS SO HARD TO GET A WARRANT THESE DAYS /S

0
1

[–] LaserOstriches 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Only if they aren't lying to the judge who grants them.

0
0

[–] Balrogic ago 

At least the court makes a point to punish law enforcement officials and prosecutors that lie and defraud the court on a daily basis. /s

0
4

[–] BloodPool 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I somehow doubt this will stop certain government branches from doing it. "Homeland Security".

0
3

[–] Ulluses 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Dude you're meant to cough, like this: "Oh I don't think anyone is funding ISIS- Cough CIA Cough Saudi Royalty Cough- Oh sorry, I need some water here."

0
1

[–] BloodPool 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Ha! Good point.

0
3

[–] ximian 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Interesting if the Judiciary and the Executive will see eye to eye on this!

0
0

[–] JesTheRed ago 

The government responded "we completely agree, you're absolutely correct, we'll do just that."

Then reinterpreted the ruling secretly to mean that she'd authorized unlimited warrants.

0
0

[–] Ebenbane ago 

Like that will stop them

0
0

[–] ThatGuyD ago 

4th Amendment Lives is a pretty big stretch of the truth. That court can't tell the Gov't shit, so the article is useless.

0
0

[–] MrMicrowave ago 

NSA is already shifting the onus of maintaining user's data to private companies. This bypasses the warrant requirement, since you're signing away your right to privacy in user agreements.

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)