I've been posing this question lately:
I was told the house's case was "overwhelming" and "irrefutable". If that's the case, why the need for Bolton to testify? If Bolton's testimony is so integral to their case, how did they pass impeachment in the house without it? Am I to believe that the house passed articles with insufficient evidence?
I then go on to tell them that, considering the GOP was barred from calling witnesses in the house, I'd be happy to see them call some in the senate.
Haven't gotten a logical response yet.
[–] Blacksmith21 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
I'm not sold on Crenshaw. Then again, POTUS just gave a shout out to Christie in NJ. Go figure...
[–] Robinsnest2 ago
And I noticed the audience clapped sparingly .
[–] anotherdream 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
They know who he is. His fucking pirate face was all over youtube a month ago threatening people asking questions about Israel and their involvement in our government. He's a tool.
[–] jimibulgin 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago (edited ago)
Crenshaw is a jew cum sucking faggot. He probably lost an eye by taking a load to the face. I hope he reads this.
[–] WillGreeley 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
And why are the Republicans cowtowing to the left/NWO/Globalists? McConnell is a traitor!
[–] SexMachine 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Also Crenshaw, "Israel First!"