1
-1

[–] LakotaPride [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Patriots we really need to keep our eyes on this ruling.

0
1

[–] ButtersThatsMe 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

This is the way the Dems cheat

1
-1

[–] LakotaPride [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Exactly Patriot, another way to steal votes.

0
1

[–] gr8tinfo 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Over the last many decades the rights and freedoms of the American people have been chipped away by corrupt judges who used excuses like the constitution is a "living document" or "outdated". We need to scrape off all these "reinterpretations" and get back to "it means what it says".

1
0

[–] LakotaPride [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Exactly Patriot, I totally agree, and great point.

0
1

[–] blk-knight 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

why would you change what our founding fathers wanted? Something stinks here.

1
-1

[–] LakotaPride [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Great point Patriot, yes it does, they want to get rid of the Constitution and what our founding Fathers wanted, time for them to be stuffed and cuffed and shipped to GTMO, we the people have had enough of their crap.

0
1

[–] Zammyanci 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

PRAYING.

1
0

[–] LakotaPride [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

joining in the prayer Patriot, asking for extra patience for myself lately. I think I used up three lifetimes worth of patience with all this crap.

0
1

[–] Zammyanci 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You and me both 😊

0
1

[–] tjliberty69 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The Electors will be freed. The election of the President is a federal election. Federal elections are controlled by the federal Constitution and laws of the United States, not controlled by the State Constitutions. State laws forcing the electors in the state to vote for anyone in particular ie; the popular vote winner in their state or the national popular vote winner if they passed that type of law which is what they would have to do if they join the NPV compact. The word elector means the same thing Constitutionally in regard to voting for Representatives, Senators or for President. The ONLY difference is in order to vote for President you must get appointed to be a 12th Amendment Elector according to the Manner chosen by your State. Think about this, if States could force an Elector to vote for a specific person in one federal election , they would would be only 1 piece of legislation away from telling all Electors how they must vote in all federal elections. There is a lot more buttressing my arguement, those details will have to wait.

1
-1

[–] LakotaPride [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Great post Patriot and that's how the SCOTUS should rule, but we know these judges have pulled some serious crap in the past, so until we get ruling. we can not take anything for granted.

0
1

[–] Alderwolf 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

This case is actually a good thing because it would really hurt democrat corruption and their quest to abolish the electoral collage if it turns out the way I see it going. Something that should be noted about these three Washington state electors, they were from eastern Washington that was solidly pro Trump thus they were NOT faithless electors like the liberal dog shit in Seattle and Olympia would have everyone believe.

1
3

[–] LakotaPride [S] 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Patriot this is pure democrat crap, if your state is win by one candidate, and the state gives the vote to the other, they just removed the vote of the people. meaning not only is the State not representing the will if the people, but also removed your right to vote. only makes sense to Demsoncrack I suspect.

0
1

[–] mrsray 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

i like how there were no problems with it 'till now

1
0

[–] LakotaPride [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Exactly, Patriot, and now the State thinks it can nullify the vote and will of the people from that State. Election fraud openly being conducted.

0
0

[–] tjliberty69 ago 

This part of the Constitution has never been argued in front of the supreme Court. No case has ever been brought because no Elector had ever been removed or fined by their State. Therefore since no one had ever been "injured" no one had standing to settle this issue at the supreme Court. Think about that, THE WAY WE ELECT THE PRESIDENT HAS NEVER BEEN SETTLED BY THE SCOTUS. It is democrat Electors that filed suits against their states in 2016. Those democrat Electors did not want to vote for Hillary even though she won in their states. Elector freedom will hurt democrats more than republicans. It is hugely important that pro Trump republican citizens get nominated as 12th Amendment Electors so if republicans win their in their state they will vote for Trump. The democrats who get appointed as 12th Amendment Electors and are also Bernie supporters will not vote for Biden or Warren, they would rather revolt against their party for stealing it again from Bernie. Elector freedom will benefit Trump. It would have probably hurt him in 2016 due to never Trumpism at the time but now We the People support Trump yugely. Never Trumpism has been reduced to only affecting establishment republicans, We the People have been vaccinated against this disease. Excelsior Patriot.

0
1

[–] mrsray 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

anti constitutional ... f them

0
1

[–] tjliberty69 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

If you look at all my posts on this subject you will probably conclude that i have studied this subject extensively. I am merely dropping crumbs here. More in depth results of my research will be coming soon. You will know when it does my friend.

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)