[–] Dyavin 0 points 17 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago
This. This environment is only sustainable until it gets so big that the dollar signs floating over it cause it's inevitable ruin. With the way things are going, some sort of global and local regulation of the internet will eventually kill our ability to even have things like Voat in small settings. The internet already isn't free anymore, and it's only going to get worse. People will keep fighting, but money always wins.
[–] go1dfish 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
There ain't no such thing as free speech, let us instead focus on making it cheaper.
http://go1dfish.me/blog/crypto-anarchy-social-aggregator-bitcoin-world-wide-ledger
[–] Girthcontrol 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
This is the second link of yours I've clicked where all I see is an animated image macro following by a blank page. What gives?
[–] downvotesattractor 0 points 16 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago
/b/ actually survived for a long time without SJWs. It's a pretty cool strategy: SJWs are sensitive people. Make VOAT such that sensitive people find it repulsive.
In other words, flood the front page with porn.
[–] Gerplunckamo ago
You'd need a lot more than porn to emulate /b/.
I've got about 2 gigs of gore, should the need to repel those cock juggling thunder cunts ever arise.
[–] Gracchi ago
The reasons that worked on 4chan were because there was no voting to sort things to keep repulsive content out of view. And, at least from my view on the outside, Moot did a pretty valiant job of not chasing the money for a long time.
[–] Rea11yN0tMe 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago
Hey, you are a retarded faggot, fuck off :)
[–] idunnome ago
Okay. Really stupid question here: What's an "SJW"?