[–] SparklingWiggle ago
The company official said the language used and sentiments expressed in these communications “are inconsistent with Boeing values, and the company is taking appropriate action in response.”
The comments caused the failure, huh? Maybe someone should have listened to these commentators before things went wrong.
I would say in this case they're more like open flames and gasoline.
[–] neuschwabia ago
Continued proof that "human Resources" is Neither.
[–] SparklingWiggle ago
Coal is a resource and to many companies humans are a similar resource to be used and discarded. They look at price and not much else.
[–] Spiteful_Mutant 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
What's really sad about all of this is that Boeing had a perfectly good platform to compete, but misread the future. If they had kept the 757 platform (single-isle/narrow body) they would have easily been able to develop it into the platform they were striving for with the 737-max.
Airbus introduced the A320 as a competitor to the 757.
[–] neuschwabia 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Microsoft is a prime example, hire trash get trash results.
[–] lorlipone ago
"It was only 346 people; we feel the bigger tragedy is the tone and lack of sensitivity of the people who tried to prevent those 346 deaths.