0
3

[–] kjaya 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Looking fresh, my friend.

0
2

[–] LamiaMiia 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Looks like it was coded in 1984 too.

0
0

[–] awshidahak ago  (edited ago)

yo 1994. If it was coded in 1984, it'd have the theme that is does now, just with lower resolution.

Edit: Put a yo so my post doesn't get enumerated.

0
1

[–] HP48GX 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

When i say that ever since windows 2k there hasn't been any significant advancement in windows operating systems but only reskinning of the same shit and breaking compatibility ever so slightly to force you to "upgrade", this is what i mean. Frankly, as far as the operating system side is concerned, windows is still behind qnx and linux.

0
1

[–] Scratchie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

An Amiga 1000 with a Sidecar and a 1MB memory expansion multitasking 3 MSDos 4.? shells was the height of Microsoft technology.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] dave31175 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It seems to me that Win and Mac are both going out of their way to make each update more user-unfriendly and more unusable. I seriously need to start looking into Linux. Surely it can't be any worse...

0
1

[–] Oeoeoeoeoeoeoe 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Be honest. You'd use that Run dialog box tile. I know I would

1
1

[–] i-_-i 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

so, it basically still looks like win 8?

0
3

[–] wootnessmonsters 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Looks can be deceiving, notice the top left corner?

Oh yeah baby, it's back. THE START BUTTON IS BACK!!! WOOO!!!

1
1

[–] i-_-i 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

OH MY GOD I DIDN?T EVEN NOTICE!!! THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING!!

1
2

[–] totlmstr 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

At least it's not Vista...

0
3

[–] EbolaPie 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Meh, after you installed the service packs Vista wasn't really all that bad.

0
0

[–] brokenvan ago 

Thats the start menu for windows 8

load more comments ▼ (7 remaining)