0
0

[–] 21985847? [S] ago  (edited ago)

Rebuilding America's Defenses

Written before the September 11 attacks, and during political debates of the War in Iraq, a section of Rebuilding America's Defenses entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" became the subject of considerable controversy: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor." Journalist John Pilger pointed to this passage when he argued that Bush administration had used the events of September 11 as an opportunity to capitalize on long-desired plans.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century#Rebuilding_America's_Defenses

0
0

[–] 21985995? ago 

Whatever.

0
0

[–] 21986056? ago 

If you’re comparing blowing up some smelly sand nigger to Pearl Harbor I think you are mistaken.

0
1

[–] 21986339? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The "Pearl Harbor" the document refers to is the September 11 attacks, one year before they occurred.

0
0

[–] 21986406? ago 

But that didn’t work. That has nothing to do with what just happened.

0
0

[–] 21986173? ago 

Neo-con. Beware.

0
1

[–] 21986473? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

And if we destroy just the militant leaders of Iran, is that bad?

0
0

[–] 21986484? ago 

You wondered if impeachment didn't work what was coming next.

0
0

[–] 21986661? ago 

More Americans must die for Israel

0
0

[–] 21986759? ago 

Iran is one of only 7 countries that dont have a rothschild owned bank...