0
0

[–] Groff ago 

Don't forget Britain's involvement.

3
0

[–] sweetholymosiah 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago  (edited ago)

This is inaccurate. The current Iranian government is a result of a 'revolution' against the installed US dictator.

So yes, the current situation is a result of the initial CIA coup in the 50s, but the '79 revolution is in response to US aggression and is not a direct product of CIA intervention.

0
1

[–] Pollycracker [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Do some reading friend.

0
0

[–] sweetholymosiah ago 

Anything specific? Care to disagree with anything I've stated so far?

1
0

[–] deleteme123 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Bingo. Clueless OP.

3
-1

[–] sweetholymosiah 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

Pathetic how many people upvoted this garbage post.

2
0

[–] DanijelStark 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

I am still trying to comprehend how the fuck so many people here on VOAT think that Iran is a "good guy" just because theyre anti-Israel ?

In truth , when was the last time Iran DIRECTLY attacked Israel or Israeli assets in the region ? They always used proxy forces ( Hezbollah ) .

Considering Iran is definitely NOT like it was just several decades ago , but a country fueled by Islamic sectarianism and more hardline Islamic country ( altough , less than some Sunni examples ) , then how the heck can it be a "good guy" ?

Of course that it is CIA creation , ever since overthrowing Mosaddegh , it went into down spiral ...

0
1

[–] AlexanderMorose13 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You're absolutely right, by chaos on the doorstep of the C_A and the DS is something that we could always use a lot more of. The more they make moves, the more we anticipate those moves and counterattack faster. They're now stranded on a sinking ship, trying desperately to bail the water out while the water is coming in too fast.

0
0

[–] SanFranTrailerPark ago 

Ok well drop Israel and we drop the Iran problem. That means the CIA is heavily or completely tethered to Israel.

0
0

[–] WillGreeley ago 

Isn't Jimmy Carter the birthplace of Iran's restoration to the 'Persian Kingdom'?

2
0

[–] HighEnergyLife 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

So why is john Bolton congratulating the attack?

0
5

[–] alphazebra 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Because neocons like any attack that signals conflict. Means the military-industrial complex companies they are part of make more money. Hopefully this attack was surgical and serves to stop more fighting rather than prolong it.

0
2

[–] Doglegwarrior 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

john bolton is one giant deep state george bush era piece of shit chicken hawk who id love to punch in the face.

0
0

[–] HighEnergyLife ago 

Exactly, so I like being on the other side of his positions

0
2

[–] AlexanderMorose13 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Bolton's a retard who jumps up and yells like Yosemite Sam whenever a bomb or gun goes off so he can rush "aid" to the battle, by which I mean profit off of war.

0
1

[–] Swallowdaredpill 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Because they hope this will start a war.

2 replies

1
0

[–] zxcvzxcv 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Obama's (((white))) grandfather was a bigshot in the cia. Obama sends free cash to iran. makes sense

1
-1

[–] Dalai_Llama 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

That and UK kikes.