[–] 21973886? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
That wording sounds to me like they could (and would) terminate recognized blue-checkmark account names, and allow them to be registered by ANYONE. Leaving them open to nefarious users stealing the open account, and presuming to be the original user. The ramifications of are terrifying.
[–] 21974873? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
We should have rallied when the first account was taken down.
The Freedom of e-Assembly Act of 2020
On application of any two or more US Citizens, representing all members of an electronically gathered collective, any platform provider:
is prohibited from censoring or restraining any communication of a member of the collective to any other member or members of the collective; and
Is prohibited from adding or deleting members of the collective, except by agreement of the original members of the collective having membership at the time of application.
[–] 21973796? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yeh, just got suspended for tweeeting, "She needs to be executed for crimes against humanity, along with a few others. Save the cells for less egregious offenders like Strock, Page, Comey, etc. "
This was in response to someone else stating HRC should be put in GITMO. Made an appeal stating that this tweet was in direct line with Constitutional Law penalties for treasonous activity against the United States.
Probably wont help, since I didnt blubber over it begging. IDGAF. If they reinstate fine and if they dont, fine.
[–] 21973178? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
It is interesting that they are doing this in one jurisdiction but not another.
This makes it easy for someone who is set up to tunnel out through a suitably placed VPN, to see exactly what is being censored.
[–] 21974884? 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
That already happened to POTUS and was proven via an Indonesian VPN.