1
9

[–] 21953990? 1 point 9 points (+10|-1) ago 

Expected timeframe for justice? 2098 or 2099.

2
17

[–] 21954007? 2 points 17 points (+19|-2) ago 

2019 and no arrests ....

0
2

[–] 21954045? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Better make some coffee and settle in. The only thing we can be sure of is that the arrests must come while Trump is still in the White House. Other than that, honestly it could be another 4 years (I don't think it'll take that long but it might).

7
-2

[–] 21954245? 7 points -2 points (+5|-7) ago 

There have been arrests. Just all Trump guys. LMAO

0
3

[–] 21956869? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Yeah, it's not going to ever be anything overt. And Don Jr is advocating to bring all of Hong Kong to the US and resettle them, the Trumps are looking as bad as GS now

0
1

[–] 21954503? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

2020

2
0

[–] 21955896? 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

Plain and simple truth. Q said indictments in 2019. Another failure.

0
0

[–] 21957748? ago 

Indictments ≠ arrests

1
0

[–] 21958220? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Wasn't it

Indictments

[2019]

meaning, 2019 has to end first? 2019 is in a kill box, right?

0
0

[–] 21964163? ago 

Yep, you fell for it. January Fool's...

0
0

[–] 21957391? ago 

2020............

1 reply

0
10

[–] 21954051? 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

A report from US Attorney John Durham never made any sense.

US Attorney's hold grand juries, then issue indictments when the juries agree that there is sufficient evidence of a crime. Arrests are made, trials are held and the guilty are sentenced. There is no report from a the US Attorney before or after grand juries. Grand Jury testimony is secret, therefore Durham is not in a position to legally release grand jury testimony.

Why would Durham be different?

0
2

[–] 21954522? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Hopefully he’s different than Huber LMAO

1
1

[–] 21954435? 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Not too long ago, in a tv interview, he & his wife voiced skepticism regarding indictments & arrests - I was so discouraged I vowed to stop listening anymore.

0
2

[–] 21954649? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Q posted there would be indictments in 2019 ... well 2019 is almost over and NO INDICTMENTS. Are we being played?

1
0

[–] 21954985? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

No he didn't. Shill

0
1

[–] 21959857? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

@985 ... the hell they didn't ... drop 3587 ... you got nerve calling names when you don't even know what you are talking about.

0
1

[–] 21956877? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Technically there were a lot of indictments ISSUED in 2019, though not many unsealed

0
0

[–] 21964136? ago 

Yep. Maybe you should go back to the hospital and get back on your meds

0
0

[–] 21984034? ago 

@136 ... maybe you should lay off the meds since they make you follow blindly instead of thinking for yourself

0
1

[–] 21954875? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

this is really freaking out the pedo shills. love drinking their salt.

0
8

[–] 21955126? 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Correct. US Attorneys like Durham don't write reports like IG's do, they investigate, run grand juries, indict and prosecute only. The idea of a 'report' coming from him was ridiculous from the beginning but a good "throw" by AG Barr.

0
2

[–] 21955291? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Joe D claimed the IG report would come out in March.

If he's saying indictments are going to happen now, you might want to get your ballot ready, kek.

Don't get me wrong, nothing would make me happier, but using Joe D as a source is foolish. He seems more like comms to the enemy than anons.

load more comments ▼ (8 remaining)