0
1

[–] BitChuteArchive 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

0
1

[–] nation198 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Why is that stunning lol of course she won't release that shit

0
0

[–] HoKogan ago 

Common knowledge isn't stunning.

1
0

[–] Gringojones 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

If you haven't seen them because they are being kept secret, how can you claim that they exonorate trump and indict the whistleblower?

This is as bad as a CNN post.

0
0

[–] 21897056? ago 

We are astute that is why. We knew all about this before anyone else for the same reason we know those secrets are a shitshow.

Http://f4ct.co/F4ct.pdf

0
1

[–] Gringojones 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

All I see is speculation.

0
0

[–] 21897061? ago 

Nunes has seen them. Maybe he said they do.

[–] [deleted] ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] CrudOMatic ago  (edited ago)

It's not like they have evidence of any crime, let alone statutory crimes. That's why Nancy won't pass the impeachment articles to the senate - the house wants to hang it over Trump's head in hopes it damages his re-election campaign (hint: it won't - most people in this country are sick of Demonrats and their faggotry)

2
-2

[–] FederalShill 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

"Jewish agent pelosi still wont release transcripts...that exonerate jewish agent trump"

Ftfy

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] whitesilk ago 

If she gets one more facelift she will be wearing her pubic hair for a goatee.

0
1

[–] whyamIevenhere 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

If they're secret, then how does anyone know that they exonerate Trump? Not that the impeachment isn't bullshit, of course.

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)