Is it 'leftist' when OP says "fuck the patriarchy" in reference to aforementioned families/entity?
OP does not say "fuck the patriarchy".
Would it be 'leftist' if someone from the left said "fuck the patriarchy" in full reference (...) to the aforementioned families/entity?
Yes
... (and agreement with the OP) ...
Not yet proven. See first point of contention.
The way I understand it, OP would be in agreement with a hypothetical phrase "Fuck Soros, Roth[schild] & [Al] Saud". Whether that phrase is accompanied by "fuck the patriarchy" is irrelevant as a broken clock can be right twice a day.
Of course, all this is hypothetical and only OP can clarify their stance.
One can be opposed to things without "hating" them. You are obsessed with pointing out OP's supposed hatred toward this or that, when he's just pointing out what the situation is. Take a chill pill man.
[–] 21893795? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
OP does not say "fuck the patriarchy".
Yes
Not yet proven. See first point of contention.
The way I understand it, OP would be in agreement with a hypothetical phrase "Fuck Soros, Roth[schild] & [Al] Saud". Whether that phrase is accompanied by "fuck the patriarchy" is irrelevant as a broken clock can be right twice a day.
Of course, all this is hypothetical and only OP can clarify their stance.
[–] 21893899? 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
Point of contention acceptable.
Would argue that it's strongly implied though. We're at an impasse without clarification though I suppose.Actually, scratch that for just a moment, seems I misread at the start there. Hold on.
Ah yep, I see where I made a mistake. I should have instead said:
Good work on the quoting there, by the way.
[–] 21894058? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
You're referring to the formatting ?
[–] 21894087? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
It would, we agree.
[–] 21893973? 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
See edited response for proposal to address point of contention.