[–] pilgrimboy14 ago
Whether it is gone or not, it now becomes inadmissible.
[–] HelloDolly 0 points 11 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago
I always read the destruction to be her statement that the information was illegally obtained. I think she is going to be a witness against the DS. BTW she's the judge that held the Congress had standing to sue the Obama administration over healthcare subsidies. She's also the judge that held the Obama DOJ was guilty of "institutional lack of candor." I am reserving judgment on this one.
[–] KrustySpork 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
i'm with you on that train of thought. patiently waiting for that outcome
[–] Matthew1103 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
Let's not make this judge a saint
Let's not be too quick to give this Judge a pass. Awfully suspicious also that now she decides to retire.
https://clintonfoundationtimeline.com/tags/judge-rosemary-collyer/
[–] [deleted] ago
[–] coulditbe4Q 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
....and being replaced by another Obummer appointee.
Still watching....
Still waiting....
[–] obvoiusly [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
"FISA JUDGE ROSEMARY COLLYER’S ORDER: DESTROY SURVEILLANCE DATA COLLECTED ON AND BEFORE MARCH 17, 2017, DATE “THE HAMMER” CIA/FBI WIRETAP ON TRUMP WAS EXPOSED AND SAME DAY SCHIFF HELD MEETING ON TRUMP WIRETAP CLAIM"
Coverup? what Coverup?
[–] CokeOrPepe ago
In other words, “DELET THIS!”
[–] NineRounds ago
"DELETE IT EVEN!"