0
0

[–] Matthew1103 ago 

DiGenova is asked if he believes Judge Collyer is doing “enough” in reaction to the IG report. The answer is no.

This is too little, too late. This is grandstanding and save your ass kind of stuff by a federal judge. There should have been contempt hearings before the FISA Court already. She didn’t have to wait. She knew everything. She knew back in 2018 that there was illegal spying. She knew she’d been lied to in the Carter Page affidavit. She knew that the assistant attorney general for the National Security Division, John Carlin, had filed false annual certifications of compliance with minimization standards on 702 databases about Americans.

https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2019/12/26/digenova-calls-mike-rogers-cooperation-durham-team-biggest-single-development-heres/

0
0

[–] Latinatrumplover ago 

"On February 3, 2009, THE HAMMER went live, under the direction of Brennan and Clapper, says Montgomery." Is that date a typo?

0
0

[–] Pointyball ago 

This would be destruction of evidence in an ongoing case. That case being impeachment.

0
0

[–] Secret_1 ago  (edited ago)

I thought, ANY DESTRUCTION of evidence or voting ballots AUTOMATICALLY would be considered "obstruction" and an arrest would be immediate!

0
0

[–] DickCaveat ago 

Countdown?

317..217...

0
0

[–] swamph8r ago 

Destroying evidence assists the coverup.

0
0

[–] Whizwit21 ago 

I guess we know whether or not the courts for complicit with the fbi lies now

0
0

[–] 1scm ago 

Only shows how dumb she is. Does she really think that the 'destroyed' data is gone?

0
0

[–] pilgrimboy14 ago 

Whether it is gone or not, it now becomes inadmissible.

0
0

[–] 1scm ago 

False!

load more comments ▼ (6 remaining)