[–] Secret_1 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 12 months ago (edited 12 months ago)
I thought, ANY DESTRUCTION of evidence or voting ballots AUTOMATICALLY would be considered "obstruction" and an arrest would be immediate!
[–] DickCaveat 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1 year ago
Countdown?
317..217...
[–] swamph8r 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1 year ago
Destroying evidence assists the coverup.
[–] Whizwit21 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1 year ago
I guess we know whether or not the courts for complicit with the fbi lies now
[–] 1scm 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1 year ago
Only shows how dumb she is. Does she really think that the 'destroyed' data is gone?
[–] pilgrimboy14 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1 year ago
Whether it is gone or not, it now becomes inadmissible.
False!
[–] obvoiusly [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) 1 year ago
"FISA JUDGE ROSEMARY COLLYER’S ORDER: DESTROY SURVEILLANCE DATA COLLECTED ON AND BEFORE MARCH 17, 2017, DATE “THE HAMMER” CIA/FBI WIRETAP ON TRUMP WAS EXPOSED AND SAME DAY SCHIFF HELD MEETING ON TRUMP WIRETAP CLAIM"
Coverup? what Coverup?
[–] CokeOrPepe 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 1 year ago
In other words, “DELET THIS!”
[–] NineRounds 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 12 months ago
"DELETE IT EVEN!"
[–] Secret_1 ago (edited ago)
I thought, ANY DESTRUCTION of evidence or voting ballots AUTOMATICALLY would be considered "obstruction" and an arrest would be immediate!