0
1

[–] eldorann 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Who else thinks that the Q-team may be behind many of these "leaks" about the Cabal?

0
0

[–] Pointyball ago 

This would be destruction of evidence in an ongoing case. That case being impeachment.

0
0

[–] Secret_1 ago  (edited ago)

I thought, ANY DESTRUCTION of evidence or voting ballots AUTOMATICALLY would be considered "obstruction" and an arrest would be immediate!

0
0

[–] swamph8r ago 

Destroying evidence assists the coverup.

0
0

[–] DickCaveat ago 

Countdown?

317..217...

0
1

[–] mac1221 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

NSA Director Rogers Disclosed FISA Abuse Days After Page Warrant Was Issued

This is a very good detailed article by Jeff Carlson. He states,

"Rogers presented his findings directly to the FISA court’s presiding judge, Rosemary Collyer. Collyer and Rogers would work together for the next six months, addressing the issues that Rogers had uncovered.

It was Collyer who wrote the April 26, 2017, FISA Court ruling on the entire episode. It also was Collyer who signed the original FISA warrant on Carter Page on Oct. 21, 2016.

Rogers informed Collyer of the ongoing FISA abuses by the FBI and NSD just three days after she personally signed the Page FISA warrant."

https://www.theepochtimes.com/nsa-director-rogers-disclosed-fisa-abuse-days-after-carter-page-fisa-was-issued_2692033.html

In the American Report article it states,

“NSA will no longer collect certain internet communications that merely mention a foreign intelligence target,” the NSA stated on April 28, 2017.

The NSA further stated that it will “delete the vast majority of its upstream internet data to further protect the privacy of U.S. person communications.”

Judge Collyer’s order to delete domestic surveillance data constitutes destruction of evidence of a crime and is a violation of the Federal Records Act."

So, if Collyer was working with Rogers to clean up the FISA court, why would she order evidence of illegal surveillance to be destroyed? She must have known the extent of the surveillance because she signed some of the warrants. Where was the oversight? We know that "the hammer" had been spying on Americans for years. What gives? Is this a coverup? What does Admiral Rogers know about the destruction of evidence? Is this part of what Rogers is discussing with Durham?