[–] Tsilent_Tsunami 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Styx is such a sophomoric, disrespectful cringelord.
Styx sucks, can't debate, and is fake and gay
Styx is totally out of his depth. And delusional.
This guy has zero intellectual abilities...
Styx is angry at God.. so he attacks Dr Jones.
styx is that nerd who thinks hes wizard pagan right?
Agreed, but that degenerate fag gets hanged on the day of the cure.
[–] Native [S] 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Comments from the youboob video:
Styx is such a sophomoric, disrespectful cringelord. Not a good faith debate at all. He came off as having something against Dr Jones from the get-go, clearly owing to a resentment toward religion. What a cocky buffoon. How does anyone like this guy?
That was a bit disappointing, the conversation could have been a lot better. It seemed that Styx agreed that porn is harmful, we could have gone from there. His reduction of the argument to a matter of faith and his dismissal of the arguments of anyone with St. in their name was annoying. At the same time, considering that the question was “should porn be banned,” his pragmatic argument is valid, ironically, in line with Aquinas’s assertion that a law that cannot be expected to be followed by most people is a bad law.
E.m.j was correct, its supposed to be an HONEST debate. Not a knock down drag out brawl for self aggrandizement. Embarrasing for Styx to take this chance for everyone to explore this complex isssue and make it all about himself. People are not hurt by pornography? Not addicted? Not demoralised? Not altered intrinsically? Of course they are, thats why porn is used as a weapon to stop strong families from existing. If you cant see that you have no interest in truth. Styx the weakest should be his new nickname.
Styx avoided the evidence that porn was a political and social weapon (Jones referenced the history of subversion, with CATO institute and such); he avoided how this doesn't victimise it's citizens (in his libertarian state) - he avoided the critique of how does libertarianism stop the oligarchs from harming it's citizens since the possibility of a good form of strong governance is missing; and he used anecdotal examples of how weed is addictive (but somehow porn isn't/is) even though previously at the beginning of the conversation he was happy to use analogies to video games/drugs to dismiss Dr. Jones.
Frankly the debate got out of hand - alot of interruptions which began and continued with Styx who asked a tonne of questions about governance. And Ralph could have structured it to stop so many interruptions. I also don't know why Styx was trying to insult Augustine; one of the most famous philosophers to exist who Dr. Jones was merely quoting - not as an appeal to authority but as a testament of wisdom.
LOGOS is rising nevertheless!
https://www.invidio.us/watch?v=DBjzyEckTVE :
The Porn Debate: E. Michael Jones vs. Styxhexenhammer666 #Killstream MIRROR - YouTube
[–] ARsandOutdoors 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I knew that with the opening that EMJ gave Styxx was done. There was no way in hell you could debate your way out of that mountain of information EMJ dropped on him.
I used to listen to Styxx daily on the way to work, his day to day political coverage is ok. But he thinks to highly of himself
[–] Native [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
E Michael Jones should have simply asked Styxx why Israel played porn everywhere once they took over.
I can't believe styxx spent 15 minutes denying that porn is addictive. Of course it's addictive.
Check out Jesse Lee Peterson's podcast he's a great based black man that I've started listening to for a few weeks now, he doesn't take bullshit answers
[–] HeLovedPandas 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Israel is mental? That's uh-mazin'
[–] fellowkikepeople 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Styxx is a younger juden petersen with long hair.
I never liked that arrogantly verbose, satanic, shirtless faggot, but I do like how this video pulls his mask off very cleanly.
Thanks op.
[–] auchtung 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Styx has a pride issue, he is not nearly as smart as he attempts to be and I have never understood his status. The ramblings of an idiot narcissist that obviously has no self confidence and attempts to make up for it by dressing like a complete faggot, following some satanic ideology, attempting to talk down to everyone, constant use of bad logic, always conflates topics, etc etc... He still is under the assumption that libertarianism is a great idea, an ideology that is more or less fanatical than it is practical. Anyway, this jackoff needs to be set straight and learn to treat others with some type of dignity and respect. And how can you not concede that porn is addictive, has he ever jacked off without porn?
[–] LexOrandiLexCredendi 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Been waiting for this debate, but after reading the comments, itseems that my preconceptions about how it would go are well founded. Styx is a shill for his own lifestyle, regardless of how damaging that lifestyle may be, and refuses to even consider any arguments which counter that lifestyle. His "discussion" with Jay Dyer was illuminating enough, so I expected an actual debate to sound more like a petulant child whining that he doesn't want to eat his vegetables.
Will probably listen anyway, just to hear Jones take Styx's ego down a peg or two.
[–] LexOrandiLexCredendi 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Funny that listening to things like this and reading further back to Chesterton's debates with the atheistic powerhouses of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it's readily apparent how Christianity became the dominant religion. Greek logic, Roman eloquence, and Hebrew theology all rolled into one makes for a poweful force of argumentation. Three separate forces which had their own strengths and weaknesses when combined converted most of the world.
Styx's pathetic paganism can't even begin making headway into the realm of logic, much less eloquence or theology.
[–] Native [S] 2 points 7 points 9 points (+9|-2) ago
I've been hearing Styxx's name for years now and only watched one or two videos of his so when I heard E Michael Jones was going to be debating him on porn, I was looking forward to hearing a good rebuttal.
The debate was disappointing. Styxx is a failure and the longer these e-celebs continue the more they are shown to be frauds.
Stefan Molyneaux a fraud
Ben Shapiro a Fraud
Joe Rogan a Fraud
Milo a fraud
Breitbart media a fraud
The whole 'libertarianism" and Conservative movement is a fraud because at the heart of their philosophy is a blank slate. They have NO MORALS. If you can't answer the basic question,
Then you are a faggot and a liar.
Styxx is a faggot and a liar. The debate is hard to listen to (You can listen on podcast at #killstream)
[–] beefartist 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
I keep holding out hope for Molyneux...he seems unable to continue fighting against the creeping Christianity in his heart and mind. I did realize that all of the "help" he gives to people is given to REALLY FUCKED UP PEOPLE. Sort of like a JPB for older people who got molested or had awful parents but are more accomplished than the typical bunch JBP aimed at. His rampant lack of strong male role models in his life bleeds through too much for my comfort.
[–] Native [S] 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Yes, there's a lot of moral hypocracy that I've started to notice with Molymeme and haven't listened to him for a year after listening religiously weekly for years.
I don't necessarily have anything against him as he serves a place to help red pill people. However, he is disingenious when he doesn't bring up the JQ when he has talked about EVERYTHING ELSE.
At this point in his life, he is a multi-millionaire, at some point he needs to decided if money is his virtue or morality is his virtue. Because he doesn't seem to be able to break free from the clutches of money. One thing I like about Scott Adams is that he finally said, "fuck it, I have Fuck you money and i'm going to talk about whatever I want" Stephan needs to come out and finally say what he wants
or
You can't have both
[–] steven_feelsperg 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
(((Molyneau))) is genetically jewish, so he admits through his grandmother. Jews are genetically hardwired against God, being race mixed devilspawn from the first muhdicking angels through the Kennites, Hittites, Rephain, then later through the Caananites and Edomites. All that race mixing fucks shit up. Psychopathy is genetic deformation, ill-formed flesh. The autopsy of (((Karl Marx))) proved parts of his brain missing and deformed. More recent bio-electrical study show psychopaths don't light up areas of the brain that normal folks do. There's a reason why jews are at the highest risk for genetic mutations and insanity. Jews can only be evil and Molyneux is one of them. Evil doesn't always mean fucking your daughter's half corpse. It also means leading people away from truth. Any truth. To a jew, the truth is what they say it is at the moment they say it. If you listen to a psychopath, it always ends badly. Don't listen to (((Molyneux))).