1
-1

[–] awwisnotafarmpromise 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

christfags or any other shit religion should lose their status. That shit never should have been granted in the first place.

0
0

[–] exodusss ago 

well what religion are you then. I guess you from earth?

0
0

[–] exodusss ago 

so you have deitie in you? Try go your local chuch or Crowley and sing a song

0
1

[–] Guy_Justsome 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

501(c)3 charities can promote political issues, so long as they don't name any candidate. Because everything worth caring about eventually becomes a political issue.

If this magazine referred to Trump by name, and if they're a 501(c)3 exempt entity, then the've violated IRS rules. One of the first things Trump did (the day after inauguration, iirc) was register as a candidate for re-election. I think that was to shut up every libtard church minister praying for his destruction.

0
0

[–] kissmywhitebooty ago 

Apparently, the one time this has ever even become an issue is when a church took out a full-page ad for a politician in a newspaper.

0
0

[–] olltre [S] ago 

they did an entire op-ed from the editor calling for Trump to be removed from office

0
0

[–] exodusss ago 

greeeeeta

0
0

[–] puggy ago 

It might already be a tax-paying publishing company.

1
-1

[–] newoldwave 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

If they are going to do politics then they're no longer a religion.

0
1

[–] Fodder01 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

No we should embrace it and flood the churches with information on how this os really a fight against evil and how the Democrats represent the largest of evil. This tax exempt issue has neutered what should be the largest coalition of Christians to Vote as a block. If you want to see a rebellion, keep this train moving.

0
0

[–] Mustard_Monkey ago 

If they are a 501(c)3 then yes. Someone who lives in that State they are based in turn them into the IRS. Please.

0
0

[–] Anon331717 ago 

If it is the law then yes.

0
1

[–] LexOrandiLexCredendi 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

No. Separation of Church and state is about keeping the Federal government out of religion, not the other way around. The Founders wanted to avoid a Church of England situation, while allowing the individual States to found their own state churches if desired. It was expected that churches would be involved in government.

0
0

[–] olltre [S] ago 

source?

0
1

[–] LexOrandiLexCredendi 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/billflax/2011/07/09/the-true-meaning-of-separation-of-church-and-state/

Separation of Church and State: What the Founders Meant by David Barton

https://sites dot google dot com/site/americachristiannation/home/religion-in-the-13-colinies

A few of literally hundreds of sources. Voat won't allow Amazon or sites.Google links.

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)