0
5

[–] CMAnon 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Both are guilty as hell and they know it. My guess is if all those who are guilty in Congress were arrested for their crimes, the seats would be 90% empty or more. Honest help is hard to find these days.

0
0

[–] Podingo7 ago 

Exactly, as much as I'd like to see the all swamp turds circling the bowl before flushed, wisdom says (put personal wants aside)win Presidency, House, and Senate and live to fight another 4yrs..we all knew it would take time to drain the swamp, so why push for a trial that could be a distraction for Trump re election? Raise your hand, if you are going to turn yourself in for a crime someone else said you did(knowing you are innocent) , and take the chance you get a bought off jury deciding your fate..

1
2

[–] crystaliis 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

A senate trial would be the best way to expose all the deep state corruption and massively red pill the American people.

1
2

[–] WhyAserverWasBuilt 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Meanwhile... John Solomon announced new real TV coming for real news. Next week.

You know Trump is very experienced in high end TV. Q said think logically. Why would they be building a media outlet and what to they want to use it for? It's not The Apprentice. Trump loves to take things to the highest level and be the best.

Real news for Trump. Hahaha. It will be number one on the planet!

0
3

[–] ZombiClown 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I think they know whats coming.

2
-1

[–] Lurker17 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Yes, Mitch would like to end the public scrutiny and testimony to save his corrupt GOPe (and comrades across the aisle) members. I'm not sure if this is where Q drew the line or if this is Mitch's idea. Remember Q saying something like "if all the corrupt members of the House and Senate were removed, there would not be enough left for the government to function. For that reason we can not arrest all of them."

0
2

[–] Qd4Action 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I disagree with Q. I think the government would function just as the Constitution intended if those bent Representatives and Senators were removed. It would force Congress to stick to its Constitutional imperatives.

0
1

[–] NakedPrey 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Exactly.. In the least we need to drain their bank accounts.

0
3

[–] MZET4M 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

There will be no trial in the senate because the leadership/most members there and the leadership/most members in the house are just opposite sides of the same coin. Both are beholden to the IC and wealthy donors. The corruption of one side is juxtaposed to corruption of the other.

0
2

[–] 1scm 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

You are not connecting the dots. This is all synchronized from the top down. Any senate hearing could potentially impair future unsealing of indictments by Durham who has been working on this for almost 3 years. The senate can only show what went on and who was involved, whereas Durham can prosecute. A clogged senate with criminal cases and individuals Durham is after, is not what we need.

0
0

[–] 1Paydaddy ago 

It all comes out in the Senate or Durham exposes it, either way there is Hell to pay.

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)