[–] Basballdude 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Is that a rhetorical question? If not, maybe because of the ukraine’s upstanding snd moral business leaders?
It couldn’t have been for money. That wouldn’t be like No Name to sell out his country for ill gotten wealth...
[–] Doglegwarrior ago
why is this picture so fucking blurry any time after 2000? makes no fucking sense and looks like itnhas been fucked with.
[–] 1Anon 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
Lindsey Graham is there, right next to No Name.
Did anyone else notice after No Name's death, Graham became a lot less of a stooge for the cabal?
Graham's inspiring speech before the Kavanaugh hearing where he was throwing verbal haymakers (at the hypocrisy of the dems / media) comes to mind.
Is LG now being whitemailed by the whitehats to actually do the right thing?
[–] antler_wax 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
He's playing his part after a plea bargain. He's probably going to jail. He's been pretty solemn during this whole process. He reminded the other guilty parties of the punishment for treason, publicly. Saying, "You chose the hard way. You're going to hang if you don't cooperate".
IMO